Key Takeaways
- Washington explicitly protects military and veteran status — RCW 49.60.222 makes it unlawful to refuse, screen differently, or charge more based on military or veteran status alone, going further than federal fair housing law.
- Stereotypes and assumptions are not valid reasons to deny — you cannot reject applicants based on concerns about PTSD, deployment, frequent moves, or any other assumption tied to military service.
- Uniform screening standards are your only defense — apply identical credit, income, and background check criteria to every applicant; any deviation for military applicants is a violation.
- Accept military income documentation equally — LES statements, VA benefits, and Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) must be treated the same as civilian pay stubs and tax returns.
- Penalties reach $25,000-$40,000 per violation — $2,000-$5,000 civil penalty plus actual damages (lost housing costs, moving expenses) plus attorney fees add up quickly even for a single complaint.
- Active-duty tenants have additional SCRA protections — service members cannot be evicted for non-payment during deployment, and lease termination without cause is prohibited under federal law.
Washington Prohibits Military and Veteran Status Housing Discrimination
You screen a qualified applicant. Their credit is solid. Income checks out. Then you discover they’re a veteran and you decline their application—worried about potential service-related disability claims, housing stability, or stereotype assumptions about military backgrounds.
That decision just violated Washington’s Fair Housing Act under RCW 49.60.222(1)(f), which explicitly prohibits housing discrimination based on military or veteran status.
Unlike federal law, which has limited protections for military families, Washington State imposes strict liability on landlords who discriminate based on military or veteran status. The statute carries civil penalties, attorney fee liability, and damage awards. For self-managing landlords operating 2–75 units, this is not a technicality—it’s a compliance mandate with real financial consequences.
This guide walks you through the statute, tenant rights, prohibited screening practices, and the specific compliance steps you need to implement before your next application comes in.
What Washington Law Actually Prohibits: RCW 49.60.222
RCW 49.60.222(1)(f) makes it unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to refuse to sell, rent, or lease housing because of the applicant’s or occupant’s military or veteran status.
The statute is part of Washington’s Unequal Accommodations law, which also covers race, color, national origin, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, disability, familial status, and source of income. Military and veteran status received explicit protection through legislative amendment, recognizing that service members and veterans face unique housing barriers and discriminatory assumptions.
The Exact Language and Scope
RCW 49.60.222(1)(f): “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation, because of the race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, disability, familial status, military or veteran status, or source of income of any person, to refuse to sell, rent, or lease any housing accommodation, refuse to negotiate for the sale, rental, or lease of any housing accommodation, to represent that any housing accommodation is not available for inspection, sale, rental, or lease when in fact it is so available, or to refuse, to sell, rent or lease or to demand a greater sales price, rental, or lease consideration for any housing accommodation…”
The statute applies to:
- All rental housing in Washington (no exemption for owner-occupied buildings)
- Single-family homes, apartments, condominiums, and manufactured homes
- Advertising, showing, negotiation, lease terms, and application decisions
- All landlords and property managers (including self-managing owners)
What “Military or Veteran Status” Means
Washington law does not define “military or veteran status” in the statute, but the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC), the state agency that enforces RCW 49.60, interprets this to include:
- Current service members in any branch of the U.S. military (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, Space Force)
- Reserve and National Guard members
- Veterans with honorable, general, or other-than-dishonorable discharges
- Family members or dependents of service members and veterans (in some contexts)
- Status alone—the statute does not require proof of disability or service-connected condition
You cannot refuse housing based on assumptions, stereotypes, or concerns about service-related disabilities, mental health conditions, or behavioral risks. The statute is status-based, not condition-based.
Comparison: Federal vs. Washington Military Housing Protections
| Legal Framework | Military/Veteran Protection | Enforcement Agency | Damages & Penalties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3604) | No explicit military/veteran status protection. Only covered if discrimination also involves race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability. | U.S. Department of HUD (Housing and Urban Development) | Up to $16,000 (first violation); up to $40,000 (subsequent violations); actual damages; attorney fees |
| RCW 49.60.222 (Washington State) | Explicit protection for military and veteran status alone, regardless of disability or other status | Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) | Actual damages; $2,000–$5,000 penalty per violation; attorney fees and costs; injunctive relief |
| Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) | Protects active-duty service members from eviction and lease termination for non-payment during military service. | Military legal assistance; civil courts | Eviction barred; lease termination barred; rent reduction possible |
Key takeaway: Washington’s law is stricter than federal law. Even if military/veteran status is your sole reason for refusal, you’ve violated Washington law. You cannot discriminate based on military status alone, without showing it intersects with another protected class.
Prohibited Screening and Decision-Making Practices
Understanding what you cannot do is essential to compliance. Here are specific practices that violate RCW 49.60.222:
1. Declining Applications Based on Military or Veteran Status
Prohibited: Refusing to rent to an applicant because they identify as a veteran or service member, or because they list military service on an employment or reference history.
Example violations:
- Applicant discloses they are a veteran in their application; you reject them “because they may have PTSD.”
- You ask “Are you currently serving in the military?” and reject applicants who answer yes.
- You decline a service member because you assume they will be deployed and unable to pay rent.
- You refuse to rent because you worry about “behavioral issues associated with military service.”
2. Charging Different Lease Terms or Requiring Additional Security Based on Military Status
Prohibited: Requiring a higher security deposit, higher rent, or additional fees solely because an applicant is military or veteran.
Example violation: “I’ll rent to you, but I need an extra $500 deposit because you’re military and might move suddenly.”
Under Washington law, lease terms must be uniform for all applicants meeting the same objective criteria. If you require a higher deposit for one applicant, you must apply that same standard uniformly to all applicants with the same credit score, income ratio, or history.
3. Selective Screening or “Soft” Discrimination
Prohibited: Applying stricter screening standards to military or veteran applicants than to others. Examples include:
- Requiring military applicants to provide three years of credit history while non-military applicants need only one year.
- Asking detailed questions about military discharge status, service-related disability, or deployment history that you don’t ask other applicants.
- Requiring proof of continuous employment from military applicants while accepting letters of employment from civilians.
- Requesting military medical or psychological records before approval.
4. Discriminatory Advertising or Discouraging Inquiries
Prohibited: Using language in property listings that discourages military or veteran applicants, such as:
- “No military personnel”
- “Civilian applicants preferred”
- “Stable, long-term residents only” (if used to target military applicants)
- Failing to respond to inquiries from self-identified veterans or service members
5. Making Housing “Unavailable” to Military Applicants
Prohibited: Representing that a unit is unavailable when it is actually available, or using delay tactics to discourage military applicants from pursuing an application.
Example violation: A veteran calls to inquire about an available unit. You tell them it’s “pending” when you haven’t received an offer, then rent to a non-military applicant shortly after.
What You CAN Do: Lawful Screening Standards
Protecting your property is legitimate. Using objective, uniformly applied standards is both lawful and necessary.
Lawful Screening Criteria You Can Require
- Income verification: Require proof of income (pay stubs, tax returns, employment letters) applied equally to all applicants. Military applicants can provide LES statements (Leave and Earnings Statements), DD Form 1172, or similar military pay documentation.
- Credit history: Run credit reports with the same threshold applied to all applicants. Military service should not factor into credit scoring—only credit behavior.
- Rental history: Request references from previous landlords. Military applicants may have shorter rental histories due to frequent moves; apply the same standard uniformly.
- Background checks: Screen for criminal history using the same standards for all applicants. Military status does not override criminal background policy.
- Lease compliance: Enforce the same lease terms, rules, and enforcement procedures for all tenants regardless of military status.
Income Verification for Military Applicants
Military applicants may have non-traditional income documentation. You must accept:
- LES (Leave and Earnings Statement): The military equivalent of a pay stub. Required quarterly but available upon request.
- Employment letters from commanding officers: Confirming salary, rank, and expected duration of service.
- VA benefits statements: For veterans receiving disability compensation or pension benefits.
- VA Home Loan Certificate of Eligibility: Proof of veteran status and creditworthiness (used in mortgage lending; demonstrates stable status).
- BAH (Basic Allowance for Housing) documentation: For service members, BAH is a tax-free housing allowance that can count toward income.
Do not require documentation you wouldn’t request from a non-military applicant. If you accept two years of tax returns for self-employed applicants, you must accept equivalent military documentation from service members.
Enforcement and Penalties Under Washington Law
Violations of RCW 49.60.222 carry serious civil and financial consequences. The Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) actively enforces this statute.
Who Enforces the Law
Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC): An independent state agency tasked with investigating housing discrimination complaints. WSHRC has authority over all rental housing in Washington State.
Contact: Seattle office (206) 464-6500 or dor.wa.gov/humansrights
WSHRC can initiate investigations based on:
- Formal complaints filed by applicants or tenants
- Patterns of discrimination (multiple complaints against a single landlord)
- Test cases (paired testers—one military, one civilian—applying for the same unit)
Civil Penalties
RCW 49.60.230 and .240 establish the following penalties for violations:
- Civil penalty: $2,000 to $5,000 per violation (adjusted for inflation; penalties increase annually)
- Actual damages: Full compensation to the tenant, including:
- Difference in rent paid vs. rent they would have paid at your property
- Cost of alternative housing (if higher-cost unit rented)
- Moving costs and deposit losses
- Lost income from delayed housing search
- Attorney fees and costs: Defendant must pay the prevailing party’s legal fees and court costs (even if the tenant’s attorney is working pro bono)
- Injunctive relief: Court order requiring specific lease provisions or advertising practices
Real-World Example
Scenario: A veteran applies for your $1,800/month unit. You decline without stated reason but rent to a non-veteran with lower credit scores. The veteran files a WSHRC complaint and hires an attorney.
Potential liability:
- $3,000 civil penalty (WSHRC determination)
- Actual damages: $1,800 × 12 months (lost housing benefit) = $21,600
- Attorney fees: $8,000–$15,000 (for investigation, complaint drafting, settlement negotiation)
- Total exposure: $32,600–$39,600
Even if the tenant settles for less, litigation costs alone quickly exceed annual management savings on a 2–10 unit portfolio.
SCRA Protections: Additional Federal Liability
If your tenant is an active-duty service member, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3953) provides additional protections:
- Service members cannot be evicted for non-payment of rent during military service
- Rent can be reduced to 1/3 of monthly pay if it exceeds that threshold due to military orders
- Lease termination without cause is prohibited
- Violations can result in federal court action, penalties, and attorney fees
Attempting to evict an active-duty service member or denying housing based on current military status exposes you to both state and federal enforcement.
Step-by-Step Compliance Checklist
Implement these practices immediately to avoid violations:
Before Advertising or Showing Property
- ☐ Review all listing language. Remove any phrases suggesting military applicants are unwelcome.
- ☐ Create a uniform screening criteria document listing all requirements (credit score minimum, income ratio, rental history, background check threshold).
- ☐ Ensure screening criteria apply equally to all applicants, regardless of military status.
- ☐ Document that criteria are applied consistently. Keep records showing how each applicant was evaluated against the same standard.
During Application and Screening
- ☐ Do NOT ask about military or veteran status on the application form (unless you’re asking all applicants about employment history).
- ☐ Do NOT request military-specific documents (discharge papers, service records, deployment orders) unless they are directly relevant to income verification.
- ☐ Accept military income documentation (LES, VA benefits, BAH) as equivalent to civilian documentation.
- ☐ Apply the same credit score, income, and background check standards to all applicants.
- ☐ Keep detailed notes of your decision and the specific criteria that led to approval or denial for each applicant.
- ☐ Document that the same standards were applied to the approved applicant and any denied applicants.
Lease Execution and Tenancy
- ☐ Use the same lease form and terms for all tenants. Do not modify lease language based on tenant’s military status.
- ☐ Charge the same security deposit amount (based on unit type and rent amount, not tenant status).
- ☐ Enforce lease terms uniformly. If you enforce noise policies, enforce them equally for military and non-military tenants.
- ☐ Provide written notice of any rule violations or enforcement action.
Recordkeeping and Defense Preparation
- ☐ Maintain application files for all applicants (approved and denied) for at least 3 years.
- ☐ Keep a written log showing the order applicants applied, screening results, and decision rationale for each.
- ☐ If you deny an applicant, provide written notice stating the specific reason(s) (credit score, income ratio, background check result) in neutral, non-discriminatory language.
- ☐ Photograph and document property condition before and after tenancy to demonstrate uniform enforcement of lease terms.
- ☐ Use a property management system or spreadsheet that tracks all decisions uniformly. LeaseBase’s compliance engine flags potential fair-housing violations in real time by comparing your screening decisions across applicants.
Training and Documentation
Self-managing landlords should complete fair housing training annually. Many violations stem from unconscious bias or misunderstanding, not intentional discrimination.
Free and Low-Cost Training Resources
- WSHRC Fair Housing Training: dor.wa.gov/humansrights offers free publications and guidance documents.
- HUD Fair Housing Training: HUD.gov provides free online training modules covering all protected classes including military status.
- Washington Apartment Association: Member training programs covering state fair housing law updates.
- Local landlord associations: Many regional associations offer compliance seminars (often $50–$150 per session).
Documentation You Should Maintain
- Training certificates or attendance records for all property managers and decision-makers
- Written screening criteria and application policies
- Application files with all supporting documentation
- Approval/denial decision letters with specific reasons stated
- Lease execution records and lease amendments
- Maintenance and enforcement records (showing uniform application of lease terms)
- Communications with applicants and tenants (emails, letters, notices)
This documentation demonstrates good-faith compliance if you’re ever investigated. It also gives you a legal defense by showing uniform, objective decision-making.
Interaction with Other Washington Housing Laws
Military/veteran status discrimination overlaps with other Washington housing protections. You must comply with all simultaneously:
Source of Income Protection (RCW 49.60.222(1)(h))
Many veterans and service members rely on VA disability benefits, VA housing loans, or BAH (Basic Allowance for Housing). Washington law prohibits discrimination based on source of income. You cannot refuse to rent because a tenant’s income comes from VA benefits or military pay.
Compliance requirement: Accept all verifiable income sources equally, including VA compensation, disability benefits, pensions, and BAH.
Disability Discrimination (RCW 49.60.222(1)(e))
Service members and veterans have higher rates of service-connected disabilities. You cannot refuse housing based on disability status (physical or mental health) under Washington law.
If a military applicant requests a reasonable accommodation (e.g., service dog, accessible parking, modified bathroom access), you must engage in an interactive process and grant the accommodation unless it imposes an undue financial or operational burden.
Violation example: “I’ll rent to you, but no service dogs allowed.” If the service dog is a legitimate service animal, this violates both disability discrimination and military status protections.
Familial Status (RCW 49.60.222(1)(d))
Young service members and military families often have children. You cannot refuse housing because an applicant has children. The same bedroom requirement and lease enforcement standards apply regardless of tenant military status.
Washington Military and Veteran Resources
Understanding your tenant’s perspective helps avoid unintentional discrimination. Key resources:
- VA Housing Loan Program: Veterans can use VA loans to purchase homes with no down payment. Many landlords mistakenly think VA loan holders cannot rent; they can.
- Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA): va.gov provides benefits information, disability ratings, and housing resources.
- Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans.wa.gov offers housing assistance, benefits counseling, and discrimination complaint support.
- Wounded Warrior Project, Team Red White & Blue, and other veteran nonprofits: Often assist veterans facing housing discrimination and can file complaints on behalf of members.
FAQ: Military and Veteran Status Housing Discrimination
Q1: Can I ask an applicant if they are military or veteran on the rental application?
A: You should avoid asking this question unless you ask all applicants about employment history uniformly. If you do ask, you must treat military employment the same as any other employment. Do not use a military background as a standalone reason to deny. If you choose to include a military background question, document that you treat military employment identically to civilian employment in your underwriting.
Q2: A veteran applicant says they will be deployed in six months. Can I deny them because they won’t stay long-term?
A: No. Denying housing based on anticipated military deployment violates RCW 49.60.222. You cannot refuse based on assumptions about tenure or future circumstances. You can require that they meet your standard income and credit criteria, but you cannot make assumptions about their ability to pay based on military status.
Q3: Can I charge a higher security deposit to military applicants because they move frequently?
A: No. Security deposits must be uniform based on objective criteria (unit type, rent amount, pet policy) applied equally to all applicants. You cannot charge different deposits based on military status or assumptions about mobility. Washington law also caps non-refundable fees and limits deposits to one month’s rent for unfurnished units (RCW 59.18.140).
Q4: What if a service member tenant gets deployed mid-lease? Can I evict them under the SCRA?
A: No. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3953) prohibits eviction of active-duty service members for non-payment during military service. If a service member is deployed, they retain tenant rights. They cannot be evicted unless they breach the lease in a way unrelated to military service (e.g., causing property damage). Attempting to evict will expose you to federal liability.
Q5: I run background checks on all applicants. Can I deny a veteran because they have a military discharge in their background?
A: A military discharge is not a criminal offense. Military discharge records should not appear on standard criminal background checks. If you’re seeing discharge information, you’re likely using a screening service that includes non-criminal records. You cannot use military service history or discharge type (honorable, general, or other-than-dishonorable) as a basis for denial. You can only deny based on criminal conviction history using the same standards applied to all applicants.
Key Compliance Takeaways
1. Washington law explicitly protects military and veteran status independently of other protected classes. Unlike federal fair housing law, you cannot discriminate based on military status alone.
2. Uniform screening standards are your only defense. If you apply different standards to military applicants than to civilians, you’re violating the law. Document that your criteria apply equally.
3. Indirect discrimination is still discrimination. You cannot use proxies for military status (tenure concerns, deployment risks, disability assumptions) as reasons to deny.
4. Penalties are substantial: $2,000–$5,000 per violation plus actual damages and attorney fees. Even one violation can cost $25,000–$40,000 when damages and fees are included.
5. Keep detailed records of your screening decisions and the specific criteria applied to each applicant. This documentation is your primary defense in a WSHRC investigation.
6. Service members have additional protections under the SCRA. Active-duty service members cannot be evicted for non-payment during service, and rent can be reduced if it exceeds one-third of monthly pay.
If you’re managing multiple properties and want assurance that your screening decisions comply with all Washington fair housing statutes—including military and veteran protections—a compliance tool that flags potential violations in real time can significantly reduce your legal exposure. LeaseBase’s compliance platform compares your screening decisions across applicants and alerts you when patterns or inconsistencies might violate state law.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation. Washington fair housing law is complex and fact-specific. If you face a discrimination complaint or have questions about a particular applicant or lease decision, seek legal counsel before taking action.
