Skip to main content
Start Free Trial

Category: fees

  • California Junk Fees Banned: What Landlords Can’t Charge — Complete SB 611 Compliance Guide (2026)

    California Junk Fees Banned: What Landlords Can’t Charge — Complete SB 611 Compliance Guide (2026)

    Key Takeaways

    • SB 611 prohibits “junk fees” — effective January 1, 2024, California Civil Code §1946.2 bans landlords from charging non-refundable fees except for actual costs (late rent, NSF checks, lease violations)
    • Prohibited fees include — application screening, tenant screening, administrative, document preparation, move-in inspection, move-out inspection, lease renewal, pet registration, utility setup, and “convenience” fees unrelated to actual landlord costs
    • Penalties are steep — $100–$1,000 per violation per tenant, plus tenant attorneys’ fees and costs; violations can trigger class action lawsuits
    • Legal fees remain allowed — actual out-of-pocket costs for credit checks, background reports, late rent fees (up to rent amount), and NSF check fees ($25 maximum under Civil Code §1950.7)
    • Disclosure required — all non-refundable fees must be listed separately in the lease before signing, with justification tied to actual landlord expense
    • No fee bundling — you cannot wrap prohibited charges into “move-in costs” or other legitimate fees; each charge must be transparent and traceable to actual costs

    What Is SB 611 and Why It Matters to California Landlords

    On January 1, 2024, California Senate Bill 611 (SB 611) became law, fundamentally reshaping what landlords can charge tenants. Codified in Civil Code §1946.2, this statute prohibits landlords from charging tenants “junk fees”—non-essential, sometimes hidden charges that have little connection to actual landlord costs or legitimate rental operations.

    For self-managing landlords, SB 611 represents a significant compliance shift. Unlike older landlord-tenant statutes that address habitability or notice requirements, this law directly restricts revenue streams. A single violation—charging one prohibited fee to one tenant—can result in statutory damages of $100 to $1,000, plus the tenant’s attorney fees and court costs. For portfolios of 10–75 units, even one tenant challenging your fee structure can expose you to tens of thousands in liability.

    The law’s intent is clear: California lawmakers determined that landlords were systematically charging fees that generated profit rather than recovering legitimate costs. The legislature banned these fees to reduce barriers to rental housing and protect tenant finances during an already expensive lease transaction.

    Why this matters now (August 2026): SB 611 has been in effect for over two years. Tenant advocacy groups and attorneys have built litigation infrastructure around it. Tenants now know the law. Charges you might have collected in 2023 are now targets for class action lawsuits. If you haven’t audited your fee schedule since January 2024, you are operating blind to your compliance risk.

    Understanding “Junk Fees” Under California Law

    Civil Code §1946.2 does not use the phrase “junk fees” in its statutory language. Instead, it prohibits landlords from charging tenants “for the purposes of transferring a tenancy from one occupant to another” except for specific, enumerated costs.

    The statute carves out only two categories of allowable charges:

    1. Actual, documented costs incurred by the landlord — such as credit reporting fees or background checks
    2. Rent-related charges — late rent fees and NSF (non-sufficient funds) check fees, governed by separate statutory limits

    Everything else is prohibited. If you charge it, and it is not tied to a direct, out-of-pocket cost, you violate the statute.

    Examples of Prohibited Fees Under SB 611

    The California Department of Consumer Affairs (DCCA) and tenant advocates have identified the following as prohibited “junk fees”:

    Fee Type Prohibited? Why
    Application screening fee YES Profit center, not tied to legitimate screening cost; if you pay a screening service, pass through the actual invoice amount only
    Tenant screening fee YES Same as application screening; must be itemized based on actual third-party cost
    Administrative fee YES Vague, catch-all fee; landlord labor is not a reimbursable cost under §1946.2
    Document preparation fee YES Lease preparation is part of normal landlord operations; profit margins embedded in this fee are prohibited
    Move-in inspection fee YES Required under California law (RTC §1950.7); cannot charge tenant for mandatory landlord duty
    Move-out inspection fee YES Part of normal property management; profit margin prohibited
    Lease renewal fee YES Lease renewal is administrative task; cannot be monetized as standalone fee
    Pet registration fee YES No legitimate cost to landlord unless county requires registration; cannot charge for own record-keeping
    Utility setup fee YES Tenant’s responsibility to arrange utilities; landlord has no cost
    Convenience fee (online rent payment) YES SB 611 prohibits “convenience fees” on rent payments; you may pass through merchant fees to tenants only if they choose a payment method beyond free standard options
    Late rent fee ALLOWED Up to 6% of monthly rent or $375 per occurrence, whichever is lower (Civil Code §1950.7); must be incurred after rent is 10+ days late
    NSF check fee ALLOWED Maximum $25 per occurrence (Civil Code §1950.7); must be tied to actual bank fee
    Credit check (actual cost pass-through) ALLOWED Only up to actual third-party fee charged to landlord; cannot markup or profit; must provide itemized receipt to tenant
    Background check (actual cost pass-through) ALLOWED Only up to actual third-party fee; include invoice with lease; no markup

    The “Actual Cost” Standard Explained

    SB 611’s core compliance requirement is the “actual cost” test. If you charge a fee, you must be able to produce a receipt, invoice, or bank statement showing that you incurred that exact cost (or lower) for that specific tenant.

    Example 1: You use a third-party tenant screening service that charges you $45 per applicant. You may charge the tenant exactly $45, no more. You cannot charge $75 and keep $30 as profit. If the service charges you $35 for one applicant and $45 for another (due to extra background checks), you charge each tenant accordingly—not a flat $45.

    Example 2: You perform a move-in inspection. The statute does not allow you to charge the tenant a “move-in inspection fee” at all. This is a landlord duty. Even if you hire a third-party inspector (which is optional), you cannot pass that cost to the tenant. The cost falls on you, the landlord.

    Example 3: You charge late rent. Civil Code §1950.7 caps the late fee at 6% of monthly rent or $375, whichever is lower. This fee is allowed, but only if rent is 10 or more days late. You do not need an invoice to justify it—the statute sets the limit. Do not try to “justify” a late fee with a made-up cost; the statute is the justification.

    Statutory Penalties for SB 611 Violations

    Violating SB 611 is expensive. California’s Civil Code §1946.2 specifies penalties, and case law has expanded tenant remedies.

    Statutory Damages Per Violation

    Civil Code §1946.2 states that a landlord who violates the junk fee prohibition is liable for:

    • $100 to $1,000 per violation, per tenant, per incident
    • The tenant’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs
    • Any actual damages (refund of the fee charged)

    What constitutes “one violation”? Each prohibited fee charged to each tenant in each lease cycle is typically counted as one violation. If you charged an application screening fee and an administrative fee to one tenant, that is two violations. If you charged the same two fees to 10 tenants, that is 20 violations.

    Damage calculation example: You charged 15 tenants a $150 “administrative fee” that is not tied to any actual cost. The minimum penalty is 15 tenants × $100 per violation = $1,500, plus refunds of $150 each ($2,250), plus the tenant’s attorney who sues might bill $5,000–$15,000 in fees. Total exposure: $8,750–$18,750 from one fee type on one lease cycle.

    Class Action Risk

    Because SB 611 violations often affect multiple tenants under identical lease terms, tenant attorneys routinely file class actions. A class action combines liability across all affected tenants and removes the burden from individual tenants to prove damages. Courts have been receptive to SB 611 class actions, particularly when a landlord charged the same prohibited fee to dozens of tenants.

    In a class action, statutory damages multiply across the entire class. If a property with 50 units charged a $200 administrative fee to 40 tenants over four lease cycles, and each tenant is entitled to $100–$1,000 in statutory damages, the landlord faces potential liability of $400,000–$4,000,000. Class action attorneys’ fees are awarded from the judgment, further reducing the landlord’s settlement value.

    Enforcement by California Attorney General and Local Agencies

    The California Attorney General’s office (AG) has enforcement authority over SB 611 violations. The AG can file suit against landlords or entities engaged in systematic junk fee practices. Several local District Attorneys in high-housing-demand counties (Los Angeles, San Francisco, Alameda) have also prioritized SB 611 enforcement.

    Individual tenant complaints to the Attorney General or local DA do not guarantee prosecution, but they create a public record. A pattern of complaints against your company or name can trigger an investigation, particularly if the complaints involve the same fee types across multiple tenants.

    What Fees Are Still Legal Under California Law

    SB 611 is restrictive, but it does not eliminate all fees. Self-managing landlords can still charge for legitimate, documented costs. Here are the categories of legal fees:

    1. Late Rent and NSF Check Fees (Civil Code §1950.7)

    Late Rent Fee:

    • Maximum: 6% of monthly rent OR $375, whichever is less
    • Trigger: Rent must be 10 or more days late
    • Timing: Can be charged only once per tenancy, even if rent remains unpaid for months (note: some attorneys contest this; check with counsel)
    • No receipt required; statute sets the limit

    NSF Check Fee:

    • Maximum: $25 per occurrence
    • Applies only if tenant pays by check and check bounces
    • Tied to actual banking cost; cannot exceed $25 even if bank charges more

    2. Third-Party Screening Costs (Actual Pass-Through Only)

    If you use a third-party company to perform credit, background, or tenant screening, you may charge the tenant the exact amount invoiced to you by that company.

    Requirements:

    • Charge only the actual third-party fee, with no markup or profit margin
    • Provide the tenant a copy of the invoice or itemized receipt showing the charge
    • Disclose the fee in writing before the tenant applies
    • Do not charge if the tenant withdraws the application before screening is complete (you have not incurred the cost)

    Compliance checklist:

    • [ ] Screening company charges you $45? Charge tenant $45, not $50 or $60
    • [ ] Get itemized invoice from screening company within 48 hours
    • [ ] Include invoice copy in lease packet sent to tenant
    • [ ] Document payment to screening company in your records
    • [ ] Do not use “screening fee” as a line item for profit; it is pass-through only

    3. Security Deposits and Other Refundable Charges

    Security deposits and other refundable charges are not considered “fees” under SB 611 and are therefore outside the statute’s scope. However, they are governed by separate California law (Civil Code §§1950–1950.7).

    Key distinction: A refundable charge (like a security deposit) is not a “fee” for purposes of SB 611. SB 611 applies only to non-refundable charges. However, you cannot disguise a non-refundable fee as a “deposit” to avoid SB 611—courts look to substance, not label.

    4. Rent Payment Merchant Fees (Limited Exception)

    SB 611 prohibits landlords from charging “convenience fees” on rent payments. However, if you offer a free standard payment method (e.g., mailed check, ACH bank transfer with no fee), you may pass through the actual cost of a faster or premium payment method that the tenant chooses.

    Example: You allow free ACH transfers. A tenant chooses to pay by credit card, which incurs a 2.5% merchant fee. You may charge the tenant 2.5% of the rent, tied to the actual cost of that transaction. You cannot charge a flat $30 “convenience fee” on every payment.

    How to Audit Your Current Fee Schedule for SB 611 Compliance

    If you have been managing properties since before January 2024, you likely have prohibited fees in your lease template. Here is a step-by-step audit:

    Step 1: List All Non-Refundable Charges in Your Lease

    Print your current lease template. Highlight every non-refundable charge mentioned, including:

    • Application fee
    • Screening fee
    • Administrative fee
    • Document preparation fee
    • Move-in inspection
    • Move-out inspection
    • Lease renewal fee
    • Pet fees (non-deposit)
    • Utility setup
    • Parking registration
    • Key replacement
    • Lock change
    • Late fees
    • NSF fees
    • Any other miscellaneous charge

    Step 2: Classify Each Fee as Legal or Prohibited

    For each fee, ask:

    1. Is it a late rent fee or NSF fee? → Legal, if within statutory limits
    2. Is it a third-party screening cost? → Legal, if charged at actual cost only and invoiced to tenant
    3. Does it relate to an actual, out-of-pocket cost incurred by me? → Possibly legal, but only if you can produce a receipt dated before or on the date you charged the tenant
    4. Is it for landlord labor, convenience, or administrative overhead? → Prohibited
    5. Can I prove I spent that money on that tenant? → If no, prohibited

    Step 3: Gather Documentation

    For every fee you believe is legal, create a file with:

    • Copy of your lease showing the fee
    • Receipt or invoice for the actual cost (if applicable)
    • Bank statement or credit card bill showing payment (if applicable)
    • Tenant signature acknowledging the fee in writing

    If you cannot produce this documentation within 48 hours, the fee is indefensible and should be removed immediately.

    Step 4: Update Your Lease Template

    Remove all prohibited fees from your lease. Replace them with only:

    • Late rent fee (up to 6% of rent or $375, whichever is less, after 10 days late)
    • NSF fee ($25 maximum)
    • Actual third-party screening costs, if applicable (with invoice attached)
    • Any other fee you can document with a receipt

    Draft new lease language for each remaining fee, stating explicitly what actual cost it covers. Example:

    “Late Rent Fee: If rent is not received by the 10th day of the month, Landlord may charge Tenant a late fee of 6% of monthly rent (or $375, whichever is less), representing Landlord’s documented cost of payment processing and administrative follow-up. This fee applies once per tenancy.”

    Do not include: Vague language like “administrative fee” or “processing fee” without tying it to an actual cost. Do not say “application screening” and then charge a fee unrelated to any actual third-party screening you performed. Every fee must be explainable and defensible in writing.

    Step 5: Notify Current Tenants

    If you have tenants with active leases that include prohibited fees, you face a choice:

    • Option A: Refund the prohibited fees voluntarily (recommended to avoid litigation)
    • Option B: Wait and hope tenants do not sue (risky; does not eliminate liability)
    • Option C: Attempt to negotiate a lease amendment removing the fees (tenants have no obligation to agree)

    Option A is the safest. If you charged 20 tenants a $150 prohibited fee over the past two years, refunding $3,000 now is far cheaper than $10,000+ in legal defense if even one tenant files suit.

    Practical Compliance Checklist for Landlords

    Before you advertise or accept an application:

    • [ ] Remove all non-refundable fees from your lease except late rent, NSF, and documented third-party screening costs
    • [ ] Verify late fee is capped at 6% of rent or $375, whichever is less
    • [ ] Verify NSF fee is capped at $25
    • [ ] If charging a screening fee, obtain signed invoice from screening company; include copy in lease packet
    • [ ] Write clear lease language describing each remaining fee and the actual cost it covers
    • [ ] Have lease reviewed by a California real estate attorney familiar with SB 611 (recommend annual review as courts interpret the law)

    When you receive an application:

    • [ ] Do not charge an “application fee” or “screening fee” unless you are about to conduct third-party screening and can produce the invoice
    • [ ] If using a third-party screening service, charge only the amount they bill you; refund if applicant withdraws before screening is run
    • [ ] Disclose all non-refundable charges in writing before application is submitted

    When you sign a lease:

    • [ ] Include all fees on a separate, highlighted line item in the lease
    • [ ] Provide itemized invoice or receipt for any third-party cost
    • [ ] Obtain tenant signature on lease showing they received fee disclosure
    • [ ] Keep a copy of the signed lease with all fee documentation for at least four years

    When a tenant pays late or uses an NSF check:

    • [ ] Apply late fee only after rent is 10 or more days late (do not charge early)
    • [ ] Apply NSF fee only to bounced checks, not ACH payments or other electronic transfers
    • [ ] Document the date rent was received (or not received) in your records
    • [ ] Send tenant written notice of late fee and NSF fee in compliance with lease and state law

    At lease renewal or move-out:

    • [ ] Do not charge a “lease renewal fee” or “move-out inspection fee”
    • [ ] Conduct move-out inspection per tenant’s right to be present; no fee allowed
    • [ ] Document any deductions from security deposit in writing within 21 days (Civil Code §1950.7)

    Common Misconceptions About SB 611

    Misconception 1: “I can charge a fee if it is in the lease.”

    Reality: No. SB 611 prohibits fees regardless of whether they are disclosed in the lease. A lease clause does not make a prohibited fee legal. The law supersedes the contract. If you charge a prohibited fee, the tenant can sue even if they signed the lease.

    Misconception 2: “Landlord labor is an ‘actual cost,’ so I can charge for paperwork and inspections.”

    Reality: No. California courts have consistently held that landlord labor—lease preparation, inspections, record-keeping—is part of normal landlord operations and is not reimbursable under SB 611. You cannot monetize landlord work as a “fee” or “cost.”

    Misconception 3: “I can charge an ‘administrative fee’ if I pass it through to my property management company.”

    Reality: No. Whether you self-manage or hire a manager, you cannot charge tenants for “administrative” work unless you can tie it to a specific third-party cost (e.g., a software subscription). Even then, you cannot markup that cost or profit from it.

    Misconception 4: “Late fees and NSF fees are prohibited under SB 611.”

    Reality: No. Late rent fees (up to 6% of rent or $375) and NSF fees ($25 max) are explicitly allowed. These are governed by Civil Code §1950.7, which sets the limits but permits the fees.

    Misconception 5: “I can avoid SB 611 by calling it a ‘deposit’ instead of a ‘fee.’”

    Reality: No. Substance over form. If you label a non-refundable charge as a “deposit,” but the tenant does not get the money back, it is still a fee and still prohibited if not tied to an actual cost. Courts will ignore misleading labels.

    Real-World Scenario: Avoiding an SB 611 Violation

    Scenario: You manage a 20-unit apartment building. Your lease has charged tenants a $200 “administrative fee” since 2015. A tenant moves out in June 2026. You receive a notice from a tenant attorney claiming you violated SB 611 by charging this fee and demanding $300 (refund plus damages). You panic.

    What to do immediately:

    1. Stop using the $200 administrative fee in new leases immediately
    2. Do not respond to the attorney without consulting your own counsel
    3. Contact a California real estate attorney familiar with SB 611
    4. Instruct your attorney to investigate whether a settlement makes sense (often $200–$600 per tenant is worth paying to avoid litigation costs)
    5. Pull your records for every tenant charged this fee in the past 3–4 years
    6. Prepare a refund for the questionable fee to all current tenants
    7. Audit your entire lease template for other prohibited fees
    8. Implement a compliance process: before charging any fee, ask, “Can I produce a receipt for this cost?”

    Outcome: If you settle early, you pay back the fees (say, $200 × 10 tenants = $2,000) plus a nominal damages amount ($100–$200 per tenant = $1,000–$2,000) and maybe $1,500 in the tenant’s attorney fees. Total: $4,500–$5,500. If you fight the claim and lose at trial, you could owe $10,000–$30,000 after attorney fees, court costs, and statutory damages for multiple tenants. Early settlement and prompt compliance going forward is the landlord’s best strategy.

    How to Track and Document Fees Properly

    Compliance requires documentation. If you are charged with an SB 611 violation, your defense depends on proof that you incurred the cost.

    Record-Keeping System

    Create a file for each tenant that includes:

    • Lease agreement — signed copy showing all fees charged
    • Fee receipts — invoices from third-party screeners, banks (for NSF fees), or other service providers
    • Payment proof — credit card statements or bank transfers showing you paid the fee to the third party
    • Date records — when each fee was charged, applied, or due
    • Tenant signatures — proof that tenant acknowledged the fee in writing

    Store these files digitally and in paper copy (redundancy). Tenant attorneys will request these documents via subpoena if a lawsuit is filed. If you do not have them, the court may presume you charged an unjustified fee.

    Retention period: Keep fee records for at least four years after the tenant moves out. California’s statute of limitations on contract claims


  • NYC FARE Act Broker Fee Rules: Who Pays & Landlord Compliance (2026)

    NYC FARE Act Broker Fee Rules: Who Pays & Landlord Compliance (2026)

    Key Takeaways

    • Landlords now pay broker fees in NYC — The 2024 FARE Act prohibits passing brokerage fees to tenants; landlords must pay 100% of broker commissions if using a broker
    • The law applies to all residential leases — Including properties under rent stabilization, market-rate units, and buildings of all sizes (effective immediately for new leases signed after the law’s enactment)
    • Violation penalties are substantial — Tenants can sue for actual damages plus treble damages (3x the fee charged) plus attorney fees; violations may trigger NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) enforcement
    • Broker fee prohibitions apply to lease-signing, not renewal — You cannot charge tenants broker fees for initial lease execution, but lease renewal terms differ; written disclosure is mandatory
    • Self-managing landlords have two paths — Hire a broker and absorb the fee, or lease directly without broker involvement to avoid the expense entirely
    • Documentation and advertising matter for compliance — Rental listings, lease addenda, and lease agreements must clearly disclose who pays broker fees; violations create tenant legal claims

    What Is the NYC FARE Act and When Did It Take Effect?

    On November 22, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the Fair Apartment Rental Environment (FARE) Act into law. The law took effect on February 1, 2024, fundamentally restructuring how brokerage fees are paid in the residential rental market.

    The FARE Act directly prohibits tenants from paying brokerage fees. Instead, landlords bear 100% of broker commission costs. This represents one of the most significant shifts in New York real estate practice in decades and directly impacts how self-managing landlords budget for leasing costs.

    The statute codifies this requirement in New York General Obligations Law § 17-107 and applies to:

    • All residential leases for buildings with any number of units (including 1-unit and 2-unit properties)
    • Market-rate apartments and rent-stabilized units
    • New leases, lease renewals, and lease amendments that involve broker involvement
    • Leases in all five boroughs of New York City and certain areas of Westchester and Nassau counties subject to local adoption

    The law does not apply to commercial leases, owner-occupied buildings with fewer than four units (in some jurisdictions), or transactions where no licensed broker is involved.

    Who Pays Broker Fees Under the FARE Act?

    The Landlord Pays — Full Stop

    Under the FARE Act, the landlord (property owner) is liable for 100% of broker commissions. Period. This is non-negotiable under the statute.

    Previously, under the pre-FARE market practice, landlords and tenants often split brokerage fees 50-50, or tenants paid the full commission. The FARE Act eliminated this practice entirely.

    What this means in practice:

    • If you hire a broker to lease your unit for a standard 15% commission, you pay that 15% (not the tenant)
    • You cannot include a “broker fee” or “leasing fee” in your rental listing or lease agreement and pass it to the tenant
    • You cannot advertise a unit as “no broker fees” to shift the burden to tenants; this would violate the law
    • Broker commissions must be paid by the landlord or their agent, not deducted from tenant security deposits or charged as move-in fees

    The only exception: if you lease your unit directly without using a licensed broker, you have no broker fees to pay at all. This is why many small landlords have shifted to self-leasing since the FARE Act took effect.

    What About Lease Renewals?

    Lease renewals present a gray area under the FARE Act. The statute explicitly prohibits tenants from paying broker fees for initial lease execution. For renewal agreements, the law’s application depends on whether a broker is involved in the renewal process.

    Key rule: If a broker is engaged to negotiate or execute a lease renewal, the same prohibition applies — the landlord pays. However, if you and your tenant negotiate a renewal directly (without a broker), no broker fees apply.

    Best practice: Document in writing whether a broker is involved in your renewal transaction. If one is, communicate the fee structure in advance and ensure your lease addendum clearly states that you will pay any brokerage commission.

    Legal Consequences for Violating the FARE Act

    Tenant Lawsuits and Damage Awards

    The FARE Act gives tenants a private right of action. If you violate the law by charging a broker fee to a tenant, the tenant can sue you in civil court for:

    • Actual damages — The full amount of the broker fee the tenant was charged
    • Treble damages — Three times the broker fee amount (statutory penalty for deliberate violations)
    • Attorney fees and court costs — The tenant’s legal representation is paid by you
    • Injunctive relief — A court order forcing compliance with the law

    Example: You lease a unit and charge a tenant a $2,000 broker fee in violation of the FARE Act. The tenant sues. A court could award: $2,000 (actual) + $6,000 (treble) + $3,500 (attorney fees) = $11,500 total liability. Plus court costs and interest.

    There is no cap on damages, and tenants do not need to prove intent — strict liability applies.

    Government Enforcement and HPD Action

    The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) has enforcement authority over FARE Act violations. While HPD’s primary focus is code enforcement and illegal harassment, the agency can receive complaints about broker fee violations and may initiate investigations.

    Enforcement actions can result in:

    • Cease-and-desist orders
    • Fines and penalties (amounts vary but are typically $1,000–$5,000 per violation)
    • License sanctions against the property or landlord in the city’s rental registry
    • Tenant remedies including lease cancellation or deposit refunds

    Additionally, violations may trigger audits of your other rental practices, exposing you to scrutiny on lease terms, rent increase compliance, and maintenance issues.

    Reputational and Business Impact

    Tenants increasingly share information about landlord practices on platforms like Google Reviews, Zillow, and tenant advocacy boards. A FARE Act violation creates a lawsuit risk that damages your ability to attract quality tenants and secure future financing or investors.

    What You Cannot Do Under the FARE Act

    Prohibited Practices for Self-Managing Landlords

    Understand exactly what the law forbids:

    Practice Legal Status Example
    Charging tenant a “broker fee” ❌ Prohibited Lease states: “Tenant pays $2,000 broker fee at signing”
    Advertising “tenant pays broker fee” ❌ Prohibited Rental listing: “Tenant responsible for broker commission”
    Deducting broker fee from security deposit ❌ Prohibited Lease deposit $2,000; broker fee $1,000 deducted at move-in
    Adding broker fee as separate “move-in cost” ❌ Prohibited Lease addendum: “Move-in includes $1,500 leasing fee”
    Charging broker fee for lease amendments ⚠️ Context-dependent If broker negotiates amendment, fee is prohibited; if done directly, N/A
    Paying broker, then billing tenant as “admin fee” ❌ Prohibited Lease includes $1,000 “processing fee” that goes to broker

    The law is written broadly to prevent workarounds. If the fee is connected to brokerage services — regardless of its name in the lease — it cannot be charged to the tenant.

    What You CAN Do: Landlord Compliance Options

    Option 1: Hire a Broker and Pay the Commission

    You can absolutely use a real estate broker to market and lease your unit. You simply bear the cost.

    Compliance steps:

    • Negotiate a broker commission agreement directly with the broker (typical range: 12–15% of annual rent)
    • Ensure the broker understands FARE Act requirements and does not solicit fees from tenants
    • Include a clear statement in all rental listings: “Landlord pays all broker fees — no tenant payment required”
    • Add language to your lease: “Any brokerage commission is paid by the landlord and is not the responsibility of the tenant”
    • Keep broker engagement letters and fee agreements in your files (proof of compliance if disputed)

    Budget impact: A typical 1-bedroom apartment in NYC at $2,500/month would incur a $2,500–$3,750 broker commission (annual rent × 12–15%). This is now your cost as the landlord.

    Option 2: Lease Directly Without a Broker

    Many small landlords have opted to self-lease since the FARE Act. This eliminates broker fees entirely.

    Compliance steps:

    • Market the unit yourself through your website, social media, Craigslist, or rental apps (Zillow, Apartments.com)
    • Screen tenants directly or use a tenant screening service
    • Conduct your own showings or coordinate with a property manager
    • Draft your own lease or use a template that complies with New York law
    • Document all communications and applications to create an audit trail

    Compliance statement to include: “This property is leased directly by the owner. No broker fees apply.”

    For self-managing landlords with 5–75 units, tools like LeaseBase can streamline tenant communication, rent collection, and compliance documentation, reducing the administrative burden of self-leasing.

    Option 3: Use a Co-Brokerage or Tenant-Side Broker

    Some landlords engage a tenant-side broker or co-broker arrangement where the tenant (not you) elects to hire a broker for tenant representation. In this scenario:

    • The tenant pays their own broker (if they choose one) — not prohibited by the FARE Act
    • You still cannot charge the tenant for brokerage services
    • Clarify in your listing: “Tenant may engage their own broker at their own expense”

    This is a nuanced gray area. Consult an attorney before marketing units this way, as the distinction may not be clear to tenants and can create disputes.

    Lease Language and Documentation Requirements

    What Must Be in Your Lease to Comply

    Your lease agreement must include clear, unambiguous language about broker fees. New York law requires good faith, fair dealing, and transparency in lease terms.

    Recommended lease language:

    “Brokerage Fees: Any brokerage fees or commissions related to this lease are paid exclusively by the Landlord and are not the responsibility of the Tenant. Tenant shall not be charged any amount for brokerage services. This lease is subject to the New York Fair Apartment Rental Environment (FARE) Act, which prohibits tenant payment of broker fees.”

    This language serves multiple purposes:

    • Explicitly informs the tenant of their rights
    • Protects you from claims of ambiguity if a dispute arises
    • Demonstrates good-faith compliance to HPD or a court
    • Reduces tenant legal exposure and defensive lawsuits

    Additional documentation to maintain:

    • Broker engagement letters or commission agreements (proof of who is paying)
    • Rental listings and advertisements (show no mention of tenant broker fee responsibility)
    • Lease addenda or amendments (clearly state broker fee allocation)
    • Email communications with tenants (demonstrate transparency)
    • Move-in checklists and receipts (show no broker fee deduction from deposits)

    Keep these files for at least 6 years — the statute of limitations for tenant lawsuits under New York law.

    Advertising Your Rental: FARE Act Compliance

    How to List Your Unit Legally

    Your rental advertising must be FARE Act-compliant from the first moment a prospective tenant sees it.

    Required disclosures in rental listings:

    • State clearly whether a broker is involved: “Landlord-listed” or “Listed with [Broker Name]”
    • If a broker is involved: “Landlord pays all broker fees — tenant pays $0”
    • Do not advertise “no broker fees” as a selling point (this implies tenants would otherwise pay)
    • Avoid vague or misleading language like “flexible fee arrangements” or “fees negotiable”

    Compliant listing example (direct lease):

    “2BR/1BA in Brooklyn, $2,800/month. Available September 1. Landlord-listed — no broker involved. Move-in: First month + security deposit. Contact [your info].”

    Compliant listing example (broker-assisted):

    “2BR/1BA in Brooklyn, $2,800/month. Available September 1. Listed by Jane Smith Realty. Landlord pays all broker fees. Tenant move-in: First month + security deposit only. Contact [broker info].”

    Non-compliant example (violates FARE Act):

    “2BR/1BA in Brooklyn, $2,800/month. Tenant responsible for broker fees. Contact [info].” ❌

    FAQ: NYC FARE Act Broker Fees

    Q1: I signed a broker agreement before February 1, 2024. Do I have to pay the broker fee now?

    A: The FARE Act applies to leases signed after February 1, 2024. If your broker agreement was executed before that date, you may have been operating under the old rules. However, if the tenant’s lease was signed after February 1, 2024, the FARE Act applies to that lease, and you cannot charge the tenant broker fees. Check your broker agreement language and consult your broker about how the transition applies to your specific situation. New agreements after February 1, 2024 must comply with FARE Act requirements.

    Q2: What if I use a property manager who also leases units for me?

    A: If your property manager is a licensed real estate broker and is being paid a commission to lease your unit, that is a brokerage fee under the FARE Act, and you (not the tenant) must pay it. If your property manager charges a flat management fee (for ongoing management, not leasing), that is not subject to the FARE Act. Make sure your property management agreement clearly separates leasing fees (your responsibility) from management fees (typically shared or tenant-paid under separate lease terms).

    Q3: Can I increase rent to offset the broker fee I now have to pay?

    A: Legally, yes — you can set rent at any market rate. However, you cannot charge a broker fee and then also increase rent as retaliation for FARE Act compliance. In practical terms, if you hire a broker, you price the unit at a market rate that accounts for your brokerage cost. You cannot charge a tenant an extra “$1,500 broker fee” on top of rent as a workaround. If you need help pricing units competitively and understanding local market conditions, tools like LeaseBase can provide analytics and comparable rent data for your market.

    Q4: Does the FARE Act apply to lease renewals if I’m not using a broker?

    A: No. The FARE Act prohibits tenants from paying broker fees only when a broker is involved in the lease transaction. If you and your tenant negotiate a renewal directly, no broker is involved, and no broker fee applies. Renewals are treated the same as initial leases: no broker fee can be charged to the tenant if a broker is involved; no fee applies if there is no broker.

    Q5: What if a tenant claims I violated the FARE Act, but I didn’t intentionally charge them a broker fee?

    A: The FARE Act imposes strict liability — intent does not matter. If a broker fee was charged to the tenant, it is a violation, even if unintentional. The tenant can still sue for actual damages plus treble damages plus attorney fees. Your best protection is clear, written documentation (lease language, broker agreements, listings) that shows you were aware of and complying with the law. If a dispute arises, respond quickly and consider settlement to avoid treble damages liability. Consult an attorney immediately if a tenant makes a FARE Act claim.

    Compliance Checklist for Self-Managing Landlords

    Use this checklist every time you lease a unit:

    • ☐ Determine whether you will use a broker or lease directly
    • ☐ If using a broker: execute a broker engagement letter and confirm in writing that you will pay all commissions
    • ☐ Draft rental listing with compliant broker fee language (or statement that no broker is involved)
    • ☐ Post listing on all platforms (Zillow, Apartments.com, your website, etc.) and verify no broker fee language is included
    • ☐ Add FARE Act-compliant lease language prohibiting tenant broker fee payment
    • ☐ Review lease with tenant and verbally confirm: “You are not responsible for any broker fees — that is paid by the landlord”
    • ☐ Collect only first month’s rent, security deposit, and authorized fees (not broker fees) at lease signing
    • ☐ File broker engagement letter, signed lease, and all email communications in your records
    • ☐ If disputes arise with tenant about fees, respond in writing within 5 business days and offer to clarify lease terms
    • ☐ For lease renewals: repeat the process above if a broker is involved; if direct negotiation, no broker fee applies

    State of Broker Fee Regulation: Trends Beyond NYC

    New York is not alone. Other states and localities have enacted similar broker fee restrictions:

    • California: AB 1359 (2024) restricts landlord-side broker fees in certain jurisdictions
    • Illinois: Chicago municipal code has adopted tenant-protection language regarding broker fees in local ordinances
    • Massachusetts: Boston and Cambridge have considered broker fee caps and tenant protections

    If you manage properties in multiple states, broker fee rules vary significantly. Verify the rules in each jurisdiction where you own rental property.

    How to Prepare for Future Compliance Changes

    The FARE Act is not the final word. New York City and State continue to regulate rental market practices.

    Stay ahead of compliance changes by:

    • Subscribing to New York State Department of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) updates
    • Monitoring NYC HPD notices and enforcement guidance
    • Consulting an attorney annually to review your lease and policies
    • Joining landlord associations (such as the Rent Stabilization Association in NYC) for regulatory updates
    • Using a compliance platform that tracks rule changes in your jurisdiction (LeaseBase’s compliance engine monitors statute updates and alerts landlords to changes affecting their portfolios)

    Compliance is not a one-time checklist — it is an ongoing obligation that requires attention to new laws and enforcement trends.

    Key Takeaway: The Landlord Bears Broker Fees in New York

    The FARE Act represents a fundamental shift in New York’s rental market. Landlords now absorb 100% of broker commission costs, with no ability to pass fees to tenants. Violations carry steep penalties: actual damages, treble damages, and attorney fees — with no damage cap.

    For self-managing landlords with 2–75 units, the practical calculus is clear:

    1. Option A: Hire a broker, pay the commission (typically $2,500–$5,000+ per lease), and avoid the time burden of self-leasing.
    2. Option B: Lease directly, save the broker fee, and invest time in marketing, showing, and screening tenants yourself.

    Either path is compliant if you follow the documentation and disclosure requirements outlined in this guide. The key is understanding your obligations upfront and building them into your leasing process.

    Use LeaseBase lease operations tools to document and track broker agreements, maintain compliant lease language, and keep audit-ready records of your broker fee compliance. For tenants managed across a portfolio, LeaseBase’s compliance engine can flag FARE Act violations and alert you to updates in New York rental law before they become legal problems.

    —

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation. New York landlord-tenant law is complex and subject to frequent updates. Compliance requirements may vary based on your property’s location, size, and rental terms. This article reflects law as of August 2026 but does not substitute for advice from a licensed attorney licensed to practice in New York.

  • Oregon Late Fee Limits & Assessment Rules — ORS 90.260 Compliance (2026)

    Oregon Late Fee Limits & Assessment Rules — ORS 90.260 Compliance (2026)

    Key Takeaways

    • Maximum late fee is 5% of monthly rent or $15, whichever is greater — ORS 90.260(1) caps all late fees regardless of lease language
    • Fee can only be charged after rent is 4 days late — you must wait 4 days before assessing any late fee; grace periods longer than 4 days are permitted
    • Late fee must be identified separately in the lease — vague or misleading fee language violates Oregon law and can result in tenant claims for damages
    • Violating ORS 90.260 allows tenants to recover actual damages plus attorney fees — ORS 90.385 makes illegal fees a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
    • Late fees cannot compound monthly or include collection costs — Oregon prohibits escalating fees, administrative charges, or debt collection markups
    • Fee timing matters for grace periods — if your lease allows a 5-day grace period, the earliest you can assess a fee is day 9 of non-payment

    What Oregon Law Says About Late Fees (ORS 90.260)

    Oregon landlord-tenant law imposes a strict ceiling on late fees. ORS 90.260 reads:

    “A landlord shall not assess a late fee unless: (1) The rental agreement specifies the amount of the late fee; (2) The amount does not exceed 5 percent of the monthly rent; and (3) Rent is more than 4 days late.”

    This statute is not a suggestion. It is a mandatory cap. No matter what your lease says—even if you include a 10% late fee clause—Oregon courts will enforce only the lesser of:

    • 5% of monthly rent, OR
    • $15

    Whichever is greater. If your tenant pays $1,500/month rent, the maximum late fee is $75 (5% of $1,500). If your tenant pays $200/month, the maximum is $15 (not 5% of $200, which would be $10).

    The statute also creates a procedural requirement: rent must be more than 4 days late before you can assess any fee. This does not mean 4 days from the due date. It means after day 4. If rent is due on the 1st and the tenant pays on the 5th, rent is 4 days late—not late enough. If they pay on the 6th, rent is 5 days late—you can assess the fee.

    The 4-Day Grace Period and How It Works

    Landlords often misunderstand the 4-day threshold. Oregon law does not grant a 4-day automatic grace period. Rather, you cannot assess a late fee until after day 4 of non-payment. The distinction matters.

    Example 1: No grace period in your lease

    • Rent due: September 1
    • Tenant pays on September 2: No late fee (only 1 day late)
    • Tenant pays on September 5: No late fee (only 4 days late)
    • Tenant pays on September 6: Late fee may be assessed (5 days late, which is more than 4 days)

    Example 2: Lease includes a 5-day grace period

    • Rent due: September 1
    • Grace period ends: September 5 (lease language specifies rent is not considered late until after this date)
    • Tenant pays on September 6: No late fee yet (ORS 90.260 requires 4 days late from the due date, not from the grace period end date)
    • Tenant pays on September 10: Late fee may be assessed (9 days after original due date; 4+ days after grace period)

    Oregon permits grace periods longer than 4 days. If your lease says “rent is due on the 1st with a 10-day grace period,” rent is not considered late until after day 10. The 4-day statutory floor does not override a more generous contractual grace period.

    Late Fee Amount: Calculating Your Maximum

    The calculation is straightforward but requires accuracy. ORS 90.260(1)(b) states the fee “does not exceed 5 percent of the monthly rent.” Monthly rent means the base recurring rent payment, not including utilities, parking, pet fees, or other charges.

    Monthly Rent 5% Amount Permissible Late Fee
    $300 $15 $15 (minimum kicks in)
    $500 $25 $25
    $1,200 $60 $60
    $2,500 $125 $125
    $3,000 $150 $150

    What you cannot charge as a late fee:

    • NSF (non-sufficient funds) bank fees—these are not late fees and may be limited under other law
    • Collection agency commissions or percentages
    • Attorney fees for collecting late rent (separate fee arrangement required)
    • Administrative processing fees under the guise of a late fee
    • Compounding late fees (a second 5% charge if rent remains unpaid into the next month)

    If your lease language lumps these costs into “late fees,” you are in violation. Oregon courts treat impermissible fees as unconscionable contract terms and may award the tenant damages.

    Lease Language Requirements: What You Must Disclose

    ORS 90.260(1)(a) requires that “the rental agreement specifies the amount of the late fee.” This is not a technicality. Your lease must:

    1. Clearly state the dollar amount or percentage — not “a reasonable late fee” or “as allowed by law”
    2. Be easy to find and understand — not buried in fine print or combined with other provisions
    3. Specify when the fee becomes due — after the 4-day threshold is met
    4. Distinguish it from other charges — separate from returned check fees, collection costs, or damages

    Compliant lease language example:

    “If rent is not received by Landlord more than 4 days after the due date specified in this agreement, Tenant shall pay a late fee of $[amount] (not to exceed 5% of monthly rent or $15, whichever is greater). This late fee is separate from any other remedies available to Landlord under this lease or Oregon law.”

    Non-compliant language (examples):

    • “Late fees as permitted by law” — vague; does not specify amount
    • “A late fee of 10% per month of unpaid rent” — exceeds the 5% cap
    • “Rent is late if not received by the 5th; a $50 fee applies plus 1.5% monthly interest” — mixes fee with interest; interest on late rent is separately regulated under ORS 90.270
    • “Late fee and NSF fee of $75 combined” — combines separate charges

    When You Can Actually Assess a Late Fee: The Procedural Timeline

    Assessing a fee and collecting it are two different things. Oregon law requires you to follow this sequence:

    1. Day 1-4 of non-payment: You cannot assess a late fee. Rent is not yet “more than 4 days late.”
    2. Day 5 of non-payment: Rent is now more than 4 days late. You may assess the late fee under ORS 90.260.
    3. Notice requirement (disputed): Oregon does not explicitly require written notice before assessing a fee, but best practice is to send a written reminder to the tenant identifying the amount owed and the late fee.
    4. Collection: The late fee is now part of the tenant’s obligation. If they dispute it, you must be prepared to show lease language and payment timing.

    A common compliance mistake: landlords assess fees on the 3rd or 4th day of non-payment. This violates ORS 90.260 and exposes you to a tenant claim under ORS 90.385 (bad faith breach of lease). Even if the tenant eventually pays, they can sue for the illegally charged fee plus attorney fees.

    Late Fees and Rent Increases: Are They Separate?

    Oregon imposes strict rules on rent increases under ORS 90.323. The question arises: if you increase rent, does your maximum late fee increase automatically?

    Yes. The late fee cap is tied to “monthly rent.” If you legally increase rent from $1,500 to $1,650, the new maximum late fee is 5% of $1,650 = $82.50 (versus the prior $75). However, you must update your lease to reflect the new late fee amount. Do not continue charging the old fee; this violates ORS 90.260(1)(a) (failure to specify the amount in the rental agreement).

    If you increase rent on September 1 but your lease still references the old late fee amount, a tenant who pays late in September can argue you are not in compliance with the lease as modified.

    Illegal Fees and Tenant Remedies

    Oregon provides two pathways for tenants to challenge improper late fees:

    1. Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (ORS 90.385)

    ORS 90.385 states:

    “In every residential tenancy, there is an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing on the part of the landlord and the tenant. A violation of this covenant is a breach of the rental agreement.”

    Charging a late fee that exceeds the ORS 90.260 cap is a direct violation. The tenant can sue under this covenant and recover:

    • The amount of the overcharge
    • Actual damages (e.g., cost of disputing the fee, credit report impact)
    • Attorney fees and court costs

    2. Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practice Claim (ORS 646.605)

    Oregon’s Consumer Protection Act allows tenants to challenge deceptive fee practices. If you advertise or assess a late fee that violates ORS 90.260, the tenant can file a claim with the Oregon Department of Justice or sue privately. Penalties include:

    • Treble (triple) damages for violations
    • Civil penalties of $500-$20,000 per violation (at the Attorney General’s discretion)
    • Attorney fees

    A single overcharge late fee can trigger this statute. For example, charging $100 in late fees when the cap is $75 is one violation. If the tenant paid the fee and later challenged it, they could recover $225 (treble damages of the $75 overcharge) plus attorney fees.

    3. Retaliation Claims (ORS 90.385(3))

    If a tenant withholds rent due to a maintenance issue and you respond by assessing a late fee (rather than addressing the maintenance), the tenant may claim retaliation. Retaliatory conduct is illegal, and you cannot assess fees as leverage.

    Late Fees vs. Other Charges: What’s Allowed and What’s Not

    Oregon distinguishes late fees from other charges. Understanding these differences prevents costly mistakes.

    Charge Type Legal Status Notes
    Late Fee (ORS 90.260) Permitted with limits Max 5% of rent or $15; after 4 days late; must be in lease
    Interest on Late Rent (ORS 90.270) Permitted with limits Max 9% annually (or 1% per month); separate from late fee; must be in lease
    Returned Check Fee Limited Oregon limits NSF fees; must reflect actual bank charges; separate from late fee
    Collection Costs / Attorney Fees Limited Only if lease specifies; must be reasonable; cannot be charged as part of late fee
    Utilities (if tenant responsible) Permitted Separate from rent; not subject to late fee cap if assessed independently
    Compounding Late Fees Prohibited Cannot charge multiple late fees for same unpaid rent in different months

    Critical distinction: Late Fee + Interest are separate. You may charge both a late fee (5% maximum) AND interest on late rent (9% annually maximum) if both are specified in the lease. However, many landlords mistakenly combine them or charge interest as a “late fee,” which creates a compliance violation.

    Practical Compliance Checklist for Oregon Landlords

    Use this checklist to audit your late fee practices and ensure ORS 90.260 compliance:

    Lease Review

    • ☐ Late fee amount is clearly stated (not “as allowed by law”)
    • ☐ Amount does not exceed 5% of monthly rent or $15, whichever is greater
    • ☐ Late fee is separate from interest, NSF fees, or collection costs
    • ☐ Lease specifies the number of days late before fee applies (at least 4 days)
    • ☐ Lease language is in a separate section, not buried in a paragraph

    Collection Procedures

    • ☐ You do not assess fees before day 5 of non-payment
    • ☐ You track the exact date rent was received (not just whether it was late)
    • ☐ You send written notice to the tenant identifying the late fee and the reason
    • ☐ You do not increase the late fee on day 15 or day 30 of non-payment (single fee only)
    • ☐ You do not assess a late fee if payment is made within the grace period stated in the lease

    Record-Keeping

    • ☐ Rent payment dates are recorded accurately (in a system like LeaseBase rent payments module)
    • ☐ Late fee assessments are documented with the date and amount
    • ☐ Tenant notifications (email, certified mail) are saved
    • ☐ If a tenant disputes a fee, the lease language and payment history are immediately retrievable

    Annual Updates

    • ☐ After any rent increase, verify the new late fee cap (5% of new rent amount)
    • ☐ Update lease language if the cap changes
    • ☐ Review lease every 12 months for compliance drift

    Common Mistakes That Create Liability

    Mistake #1: Charging 10% Late Fees Because the Lease Says So

    Your lease is not above ORS 90.260. If your lease states a 10% late fee, Oregon law reduces it to 5%. If a tenant challenges the fee, you cannot defend it by pointing to the lease language. The law preempts the contract.

    Outcome: Tenant sues under ORS 90.385 (bad faith breach). You owe the overcharge amount plus attorney fees.

    Mistake #2: Assessing Late Fees on Day 4

    The statute says “more than 4 days late.” Day 4 is exactly 4 days—not more than 4. Assessing a fee on day 4 is a technical violation.

    Outcome: Tenant disputes the fee. You must prove it was assessed on day 5 or later. If your records show day 4, you lose.

    Mistake #3: Charging Late Fees Multiple Times for the Same Unpaid Rent

    A tenant pays rent on October 15 (15 days late). You assess a $60 late fee. On November 1, rent is still unpaid from October, and you charge another $60 late fee. Oregon law does not allow compounding. A single late fee per payment period, assessed once, is the rule.

    Outcome: Tenant withholds the second fee and sues. You cannot recover it and may owe damages.

    Mistake #4: Mixing Late Fees with NSF or Collection Charges

    Your lease states: “Late fee and collection charge: $100.” This violates ORS 90.260 because you have not specified the late fee amount separately. Is it $50? $100? The ambiguity makes the entire provision unenforceable.

    Outcome: Tenant challenges the fee. A court may void it entirely or reduce it to the statutory cap, costing you the fee and attorney fees to defend it.

    Mistake #5: Not Updating the Lease After a Rent Increase

    You increase rent from $1,500 to $1,650. Your lease still says “late fee: $75.” The new cap is $82.50. If you charge $75 and the tenant pays it, you have not complied with ORS 90.260(1)(a) because your lease does not specify the current amount.

    Outcome: On audit or tenant complaint, you are found to have an outdated late fee clause. Oregon considers this a defect in the rental agreement.

    How Technology Reduces Late Fee Compliance Risk

    Managing late fees manually—tracking payment dates, calculating thresholds, remembering grace periods—creates errors. A compliance-aware rent collection system eliminates these mistakes by:

    • Tracking exact payment timestamps — not just the date, but the hour and minute, so you never charge a fee on day 4 instead of day 5
    • Automating fee calculation — the system calculates 5% of current rent and enforces the $15 minimum without manual math
    • Preventing duplicate fees — once a late fee is assessed for a rent period, the system prevents a second fee from being charged
    • Logging all notices sent — documented proof that you notified the tenant, critical if the fee is later disputed
    • Alerting you to grace periods — if the lease includes a grace period, the system waits until after that period to assess fees
    • Flagging non-compliance — if you try to enter a late fee that exceeds the ORS 90.260 cap, the system blocks it or flags the entry

    For landlords managing 2-75 units, this automation is the difference between compliance and exposure. A single $1,500 judgment for an illegal late fee, plus attorney fees, costs more than a year of platform access.

    Oregon Late Fee Rules vs. Other States: Why Oregon Is Stricter

    If you own property in multiple states, note that Oregon’s late fee rules are among the most landlord-restrictive in the nation. Comparison:

    State Late Fee Cap Days Late Required Notes
    Oregon 5% or $15 max More than 4 days Strict statutory cap; no compounding; bad faith damages available
    California 10% of rent (AB 2934 limits to actual costs) Varies; often 5-15 days Changing toward Oregon model; recent junk fee bans
    Washington 10% of rent (RCW 59.18.270) More than 5 days Higher cap than Oregon; longer grace period
    Texas No statutory cap As specified in lease No limit; must be “reasonable” under common law
    New York 5% or $5, whichever is greater More than 5 days Similar to Oregon; lower minimum; longer grace

    Oregon’s 4-day threshold and strict 5% cap mean that Oregon tenants have strong legal protections against excessive late fees. If you operate rentals across states, do not apply your Oregon practices to out-of-state properties—the rules differ significantly.

    Recent Legal Changes and Future Outlook (2024-2026)

    As of August 2026, ORS 90.260 has not been amended since its original adoption. However, Oregon has trended toward stronger tenant protections in other fee areas:

    • HB 2840 (2019) capped security deposit deductions for normal wear and tear, limiting landlord fees in that category
    • Proposed legislation (2023-2025) would eliminate mandatory NSF fees entirely, which could further limit fee recovery options
    • AG opinion (2024) clarified that “processing fees” disguised as late fees violate ORS 90.260

    The trend is clear: Oregon is moving toward eliminating unnecessary landlord fees and restricting what can be charged. Staying compliant with the current 5% cap positions you well if the law becomes even stricter.

    FAQ: Oregon Late Fees Under ORS 90.260

    Q: Can I charge a late fee on the 4th day if rent is due on the 1st?

    A: No. Day 4 is exactly 4 days late, and ORS 90.260 requires “more than 4 days late.” You can charge the fee beginning on day 5 (the 6th if rent is due on the 1st). Many landlords make this mistake and end up refunding fees that were assessed one day early.

    Q: My lease says “5% late fee or $50, whichever is greater.” Is this legal?

    A: No. Oregon law caps the fee at “5 percent of the monthly rent” OR “$15, whichever is greater.” You cannot set a higher flat amount like $50. If your lease says $50 and monthly rent is $1,000, you can only charge $50 (which is greater than the 5% of $1,000 = $50 cap). But for rent of $1,200, the legal cap is $60 (5%), not $50. This creates inconsistency. Rewrite the clause to specify “the lesser of 5% of monthly rent or the maximum amount permitted by ORS 90.260.”

    Q: Can I charge a late fee if the tenant has a pending maintenance repair request?

    A: Yes, you can charge a late fee if rent is late—the maintenance issue

  • New York Broker Fees After the FARE Act — Who Pays in 2024-2026

    New York Broker Fees After the FARE Act — Who Pays in 2024-2026

    Key Takeaways

    • Tenants cannot pay broker fees under the FARE Act (effective June 2024) — landlords or property owners must cover 100% of brokerage commissions for residential leases in NYC
    • Violation penalties are steep: $1,000 per violation plus treble damages — collecting even one unauthorized fee from a tenant triggers automatic damages of 3x the amount paid plus statutory fines
    • The law applies to all residential leases under 30 units — including small landlord portfolios, co-ops, and certain market-rate apartments (with limited exceptions)
    • Broker fee agreements must specify the party paying — vague language or hidden fees expose you to NYDOS enforcement action and tenant lawsuits
    • Compliance documentation is now critical — maintain clear broker engagement letters, fee schedules, and lease addenda showing you paid broker costs, not tenants

    What Changed: The FARE Act’s Impact on Broker Fees

    On June 18, 2024, New York City’s Fair Allocation of Rental Expenses (FARE) Act took effect, fundamentally rewriting who pays broker commissions in residential leases. For decades, New York landlords routinely collected broker fees from prospective tenants—sometimes $1,500 to $3,000 per apartment—before lease signing. The FARE Act ended that practice. Now, landlords (or building owners) must pay broker commissions directly, absorbing what was once tenant-side expense.

    This shift affects approximately 800,000 residential leases in New York City annually. For self-managing landlords with 2–75 units, the change forces a real operational and financial decision: adjust rent to account for broker costs, negotiate lower commissions, or absorb the expense. Understanding the law’s scope, penalties, and enforcement mechanisms is non-negotiable to avoid costly litigation.

    The FARE Act: Statutory Language and Scope

    The FARE Act amended New York General Obligations Law §5-701 and Real Property Law §228 to prohibit residential lease agreements from requiring or permitting tenants to pay brokerage commissions. The specific language matters for compliance.

    Who Must Comply with the FARE Act?

    The law applies to:

    • All residential leases in New York City for buildings with fewer than 30 units (or those seeking rent-regulated status)
    • Market-rate apartments (not rent-stabilized, which had separate restrictions pre-FARE)
    • Co-operatives and condominiums when used for residential occupancy
    • Lease renewals and new leases executed on or after June 18, 2024

    Limited exceptions exist: Commercial leases, office space, and mixed-use buildings where residential space is incidental do not fall under FARE. Additionally, leases signed before June 18, 2024, are grandfathered—you are not required to retroactively pay tenant-side broker fees on expired leases. However, any lease renewal signed after June 18, 2024, is subject to the law.

    What the Law Prohibits

    Under FARE, landlords and lease agreements cannot:

    • Require tenants to pay any portion of brokerage commissions
    • Deduct broker fees from tenant security deposits or rent credit
    • Include clauses stating “tenant responsible for broker fees” or similar language
    • Charge administrative, referral, or placement fees intended to circumvent broker fee rules
    • Impose “application fees” that secretly compensate brokers
    • Bundle broker costs into inflated lease amounts without clear disclosure

    The law is strict: any mechanism that shifts broker payment to the tenant violates FARE. Courts and the New York Department of State have interpreted this broadly to catch sophisticated workarounds.

    Who Actually Pays Broker Fees After FARE?

    The Landlord’s Obligation

    Under FARE, the landlord (or property owner) pays 100% of broker commissions. This applies whether:

    • You hire a broker to list or market your apartment
    • A broker brings a prospective tenant to your property
    • A dual-agent arrangement exists (broker represents both landlord and tenant)
    • You negotiate a co-brokerage commission split

    The landlord cannot shift this cost forward. If a lease requires the tenant to pay a broker fee, it violates FARE, period. No exceptions for “market rates” or “standard practice”—those defenses fail in court.

    Can Landlords Adjust Rent to Offset Broker Costs?

    Technically, yes—but with important caveats:

    FARE does not prohibit landlords from setting rent high enough to cover anticipated broker commissions. For example, if you budget $2,000 in broker fees for a lease, you can set monthly rent at $2,500 instead of $2,000 to recoup that cost. This is compliant, as long as the lease does not explicitly charge the tenant a “broker fee.”

    However, this creates a secondary problem: rent-regulation concerns. If your building has rent-stabilized units or is located in areas with local rent-increase caps (e.g., parts of Westchester or Long Island where local laws exist), inflating rent to cover broker costs may trigger compliance issues. Consult local rent-control authority guidance or an attorney before using this strategy on stabilized portfolios.

    What About Tenant-Paid Brokers?

    Some tenants hire their own brokers to search for apartments. FARE does not address tenant-hired brokers directly—the law focuses on commission-splitting arrangements initiated by the landlord or lease. If a tenant independently hires a broker and pays that broker’s fees from their own pocket, that is generally outside FARE’s scope. However, if a lease agreement or landlord’s conduct suggests the landlord was implicitly paying the tenant’s broker (via inflated rent or fee rebates), courts may find FARE violation.

    Best practice: do not offer to reimburse or cover tenant-hired broker fees in any agreement or conversation. Document that fees are the tenant’s sole responsibility if they choose broker representation.

    Penalties for FARE Violations: What Non-Compliance Costs

    Civil Penalties

    FARE violations carry automatic penalties:

    • Statutory penalty: $1,000 per violation
    • Treble damages: 3x the amount of broker fees collected from the tenant
    • Attorney fees and court costs (prevailing tenant recovers legal fees)

    Example: You collect a $2,000 broker fee from a tenant in violation of FARE. The tenant sues. Damages = $2,000 × 3 = $6,000, plus $1,000 statutory penalty, plus the tenant’s attorney fees (potentially $3,000–$8,000 for a straightforward FARE case). Total exposure: $10,000–$15,000.

    NYDOS Enforcement and Administrative Action

    The New York Department of State (NYDOS) oversees broker licensing and FARE compliance. If NYDOS receives complaints, it can:

    • Initiate investigation into your leasing practices
    • Issue cease-and-desist orders
    • Revoke or suspend broker licenses (if you hold one)
    • Fine the landlord independently of tenant lawsuits
    • Issue public enforcement actions (reputational damage)

    NYDOS has published guidance on FARE stating that violations are “priority enforcement” issues. Expect agency follow-up if tenants file complaints.

    Tenant Class Action Risk

    Several FARE class actions have been filed since June 2024 against large landlords and property management companies. While most leasehold portfolios under 75 units are lower-profile targets, small-landlord violations can still attract plaintiff-side attorneys if patterns emerge. One tenant suing opens the door to discovery that may reveal similar violations across your portfolio.

    FARE Compliance Checklist for Self-Managing Landlords

    Use this checklist to ensure your leases and broker agreements comply with FARE:

    Compliance Task Action Required Deadline / Timeline
    Audit all active leases dated 6/18/2024 or later Search for language like “tenant pays broker,” “finder’s fee,” “placement fee,” “tenant broker commission” Complete by October 2026
    Remove non-compliant clauses from lease templates Delete or revise any broker fee language; have attorney confirm new template Before next lease execution
    Update broker engagement letters Ensure letters state landlord (not tenant) is responsible for all commissions and fees Immediately; use going forward
    Review rent-setting methodology If adjusting rent to cover broker costs, document assumptions; ensure consistency and lack of tenant-specific targeting Before renewal / new lease
    Create clear broker payment documentation Maintain signed broker agreements showing landlord pays commission; keep invoices and payment records Ongoing; save for 7 years
    Communicate with brokers about FARE compliance Confirm with brokers that tenant-side fees are prohibited; confirm commission structure in writing Before each brokerage engagement
    Train property managers or leasing staff Ensure anyone discussing leases with tenants knows FARE applies; no broker fee collection from tenants Annually; new hire onboarding

    Lease Language: What Complies and What Doesn’t

    Non-Compliant Lease Language (Avoid These)

    Example 1: “Tenant shall be responsible for payment of all broker commissions and finder’s fees incurred in connection with this lease.”

    Why it fails: Directly violates FARE by requiring tenant to pay broker fees. Illegal.

    Example 2: “Tenant acknowledges that landlord has engaged a broker and tenant agrees to reimburse landlord for brokerage costs within 30 days of lease execution.”

    Why it fails: Indirect mechanism for tenant payment. Courts view this as circumventing FARE.

    Example 3: “Tenant application fee: $150. (This fee covers broker referral and administrative costs.)”

    Why it fails: Application fees cannot be used to disguise broker fee collection. NYDOS has stated this explicitly in guidance.

    Compliant Lease Language (Use These)

    Example 1: “Landlord shall pay all brokerage commissions and fees associated with this lease in accordance with applicable law, including the Fair Allocation of Rental Expenses Act.”

    Why it works: Clear, unambiguous, references FARE by name.

    Example 2: “There are no broker fees, referral fees, or placement fees charged to Tenant. If a broker brought Tenant to this property, Landlord shall pay such broker’s commission directly.”

    Why it works: Explicitly states tenant pays nothing; shifts burden to landlord.

    Example 3: [Lease contains no mention of broker fees whatsoever]

    Why it works: FARE-compliant leases often omit broker fee language entirely. Silence is safe; explicit tenant-pay clauses are not.

    Broker Engagement Letters and Commission Structure

    What Your Broker Agreement Must Say

    Your engagement letter or listing agreement with a broker should clearly state:

    • Landlord liability: “Landlord [your name/entity] shall pay all commissions due under this agreement. Tenant has no obligation to pay broker fees.”
    • Commission rate: e.g., “5% of first month’s rent” or “specific dollar amount”
    • Payment timing: e.g., “Due upon lease execution” or “Due within 5 days of lease commencement”
    • Co-brokerage or split commissions: If another broker is involved, clearly define each party’s payment (e.g., “Landlord pays 2.5% to listing broker and 2.5% to co-broker”)
    • No tenant involvement: Explicit language that broker will not collect fees from tenant

    Example broker engagement language:

    “Landlord engages [Broker Name] to lease the property located at [Address]. Landlord shall pay Broker a commission of [5%] of the first month’s rent upon lease execution. Broker confirms that Tenant shall not be charged any broker fees, referral fees, or finder’s fees in connection with this lease, in accordance with New York General Obligations Law §5-701 (Fair Allocation of Rental Expenses Act). Any attempt by Broker to collect fees from Tenant shall be a material breach of this agreement.”

    Co-Brokerage and Dual Agency

    When a lease involves multiple brokers (e.g., listing broker and tenant’s broker), clarify upfront who pays what:

    • Scenario A: Landlord pays both brokers. Engagement letter states: “If Broker brings its own client (tenant), Landlord shall pay [X%] to Landlord’s broker and [X%] to Tenant’s broker.”
    • Scenario B: Landlord pays one broker, tenant’s broker waives fees. Engagement letter confirms tenant’s broker receives no compensation from tenant or lease.
    • Scenario C: Dual agent (one broker represents both parties). Letter should clarify: “Broker is dual agent. Landlord pays full agreed commission. Tenant pays no fees.”

    Ambiguity in multi-broker scenarios invites FARE liability. Spell out payment flows in writing.

    FARE and Lease Renewals: Key Timing Issues

    When Does FARE Apply?

    FARE applies to all residential leases executed on or after June 18, 2024. This includes:

    • New leases (first occupancy)
    • Lease renewals (existing tenant renewing)
    • Lease extensions or amendments (if signed after 6/18/2024)

    Leases signed before June 18, 2024, are not retroactively subject to FARE. If you collected a broker fee from a tenant in March 2024, that is not a FARE violation (though it may have been prohibited under older rent-regulation rules). However, when that tenant renews in August 2026, the new lease is subject to FARE.

    Renewal Lease Compliance Trap

    Many landlords renew leases using a simple “renewal rider” or amendment that cross-references the original lease. If the original lease (pre-FARE) contained a tenant broker fee clause, do not simply renew it without deletion or revision. Courts may treat the renewal as a new lease subject to FARE, and a broker fee clause in the renewal rider would violate the law.

    Action: When renewing any lease post–6/18/2024, create a fresh lease or renewal addendum that explicitly removes any tenant-broker fee language, even if the old lease had it.

    Compliance Documentation: What to Keep and How Long

    Audit-proof your broker fee practices by maintaining organized records:

    Essential Documents

    • Broker engagement letters / listing agreements (signed, showing landlord pays commission)
    • Broker fee invoices and payment receipts (proof you paid, not tenant)
    • Executed lease agreements (showing FARE-compliant or no broker fee language)
    • Lease renewals and amendments (confirming removal of tenant-pay clauses)
    • Email communications with brokers (confirming fee payment responsibility)
    • Tenant communications or applications (showing no broker fee was requested)

    Retention Period

    Keep these records for at least 7 years from lease execution. Why? New York law (and FARE enforcement) typically allows claims within 6 years of discovery, and you want evidence to defend yourself if a tenant or agency challenges your practices years later.

    For leases executed in 2024–2026, plan to retain documentation through at least 2033.

    State vs. City: Does FARE Apply Outside NYC?

    The FARE Act is specific to New York City. It does not apply to leases in Westchester County, Long Island, upstate New York, or outside NYC boundaries. However:

    • Westchester and surrounding areas may have local rent-control laws that restrict broker fee practices (consult local codes).
    • Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) and state Human Rights Law may restrict fees if they have disparate impact on protected classes—a separate compliance concern.
    • If you manage properties in both NYC and non-NYC markets, apply FARE only to NYC leases; maintain separate lease templates for each market.

    Do not assume FARE applies outside the five NYC boroughs.

    Frequently Asked Questions About FARE and Broker Fees

    Q: Can I collect a broker fee if the tenant hired the broker, not me?

    A: If the tenant independently hired and paid a broker from their own pocket, that is generally outside FARE’s scope. However, if you implicitly encouraged or facilitated the arrangement (e.g., “I’ll cover half your broker fee”), you may be liable. Best practice: inform prospective tenants upfront that if they use a broker, that broker’s fee is their responsibility. Do not offer to reimburse or split costs.

    Q: I signed a lease before June 18, 2024, that included a tenant broker fee. Now the tenant is renewing. Can I keep the broker fee clause?

    A: No. Even though the original lease is grandfathered, the renewal lease is new and subject to FARE. You must remove the tenant broker fee clause from the renewal addendum or lease. Not doing so is a FARE violation on the renewal.

    Q: What if a broker pressures me to have the tenant pay their commission?

    A: Do not agree. Document the pressure (email confirmation to broker: “We confirm that Landlord, not Tenant, is responsible for your commission per FARE Act”). If the broker insists on tenant payment or includes tenant-pay language in listing agreements, report this to NYDOS and consider ending the relationship. Brokers violating FARE can lose their licenses.

    Q: Can I set rent higher and advertise it as “no broker fees”?

    A: Yes, this is compliant. If you set rent at $2,500/month (instead of $2,000) to absorb broker costs, and the lease clearly states “no tenant broker fees,” this is legal. You are not hiding the cost—it is baked into rent. The lease must not mention broker fees at all, or must explicitly state the landlord pays any broker fees.

    Q: What happens if I discover I violated FARE on a past lease?

    A: The best course is proactive remediation. Contact the tenant, offer to refund the broker fee, and execute a release confirming full settlement. While this is not a guarantee of immunity from suit, it demonstrates good faith and reduces liability exposure. Document the refund in writing. Then audit your current practices and correct going forward. If the tenant sues anyway, you have evidence of remedial action, which may persuade a court to reduce damages.

    Using Compliance Technology to Avoid FARE Violations

    Self-managing landlords with 2–75 units often use spreadsheets, email, or disparate tools to track leases, commissions, and fees. This fragmentation creates compliance blind spots—you miss language in old lease templates, lose broker fee documentation, or accidentally renew a non-compliant lease.

    Lease operations platforms designed for small portfolios can centralize lease documents, flag non-compliant language, and ensure broker fee clarity across all leases. Using compliance automation to audit lease templates against FARE requirements before signing helps catch violations before they happen.

    Portfolio management tools also help you track lease renewal dates, ensuring you do not accidentally renew a pre-FARE lease without removing non-compliant clauses.

    For landlords managing compliance across multiple properties and markets, an integrated platform reduces the operational burden and documentation risk compared to ad-hoc email or spreadsheet tracking.

    Practical Example: FARE Compliance Walkthrough

    Scenario: You manage a 12-unit building in Manhattan. Tenant Smith is renewing his lease in September 2026. His original lease was signed in January 2024 (pre-FARE) and included this language:

    “Tenant shall be responsible for payment of broker commissions and referral fees in connection with his tenancy, including those paid to any broker who facilitated his lease.”

    What you must do:

    1. Remove the broker fee language from the renewal lease. Do not carry it forward. The new lease (September 2026) must not contain this clause.
    2. Confirm with your broker (if using one for the renewal) that landlord pays all commissions. Engage a new listing agreement stating: “Landlord pays all broker fees; Tenant pays none.”
    3. Include FARE-compliant language in the renewal: “There are no broker fees, finder’s fees, or placement fees charged to Tenant. Landlord shall pay any broker commissions.”
    4. Obtain Tenant Smith’s signature on the FARE-compliant renewal lease.
    5. If you used a broker, collect an invoice showing landlord (you) paid the commission. File it with the lease renewal documentation.
    6. Retain all documents for 7 years.

    Result: FARE-compliant renewal. Tenant Smith owes no broker fees. You pay the commission. Documentation is audit-proof.

    What not to do: Do not use a simple “renewal rider” that references the original lease verbatim, hoping the pre-FARE language “doesn’t count.” Courts may interpret the renewal as a new lease containing a FARE violation. Always use a fresh renewal addendum or lease that explicitly removes pre-FARE broker fee language.

    Recent Enforcement Trends and Lessons from Cases

    Since FARE took effect in June 2024, tenant rights organizations and plaintiff attorneys have filed complaints and suits targeting landlords and property managers who collected or attempted to collect tenant broker fees. While appellate case law is still developing, patterns are emerging:

    • Lease language is interpreted strictly against landlords. Courts do not excuse “standard market practice” or claims that tenants “understood” they had to pay. FARE is unambiguous.
    • Hidden or bundled fees are not safe. If a lease mentions an “administrative fee” or “processing fee” and that money goes to a broker, courts treat it as a broker fee and find FARE violation.
    • NYDOS has prioritized FARE complaints in its enforcement agenda. Broker licensing complaints about FARE violations are tracked and acted on. Repeated violations can result in license suspension.
    • Treble damages incentivize tenant suits. Because tenants recover 3x damages plus attorney fees, low-cost FARE violations ($500–$2,000) are attracting solo plaintiffs and small group suits.

    The takeaway for self-managing landlords: FARE is not a gray area, and “we didn’t know” is not a defense. Compliance requires clear lease language, written broker agreements, and documentation of payment flows.

    Next Steps: Your FARE Compliance Action Plan

    1. Audit all leases executed 6/18/2024 or later. Search for “broker fee,” “finder’s fee,” “referral fee,” “tenant pays,” “placement.”
    2. Revise lease template to remove all tenant-broker-fee language. Have an attorney confirm compliance.
    3. Update any broker engagement letters to state landlord (not tenant) pays commission.
    4. If you collected broker fees from tenants post-6/18/2024, consider voluntary refund and settlement.
    5. Document and retain all broker fee invoices, payment receipts, and broker agreements for 7+ years.
    6. Train anyone involved in leasing (yourself, assistants, agents) on FARE compliance.
    7. Going forward, ensure all new leases and renewals comply with FARE before execution.

    Conclusion: FARE Compliance is Non-Negotiable

    The FARE Act represents a significant shift in how New York City residential leases operate. Unlike older regulations that often had gray areas or industry workarounds, FARE is straightforward: landlords pay broker fees; tenants do not. Non-compliance carries steep penalties—treble damages, statutory fines, and attorney fees—making this a high-stakes compliance issue.

    For self-managing landlords, FARE requires updated lease templates, clear broker agreements, and organized documentation. The good news: compliance is achievable with straightforward steps. Remove tenant-broker-fee language, ensure brokers understand they are paid by the landlord, and maintain clear records. Done right, you avoid litigation and operate with confidence that your leasing practices meet the law.

    If your portfolio spans multiple markets or you manage numerous renewals, consider platforms that automate compliance tracking and lease audit workflows, reducing the administrative burden of staying current with evolving tenant-protection laws.

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult


  • Oregon Late Fee Limits & Assessment Rules — Landlord Compliance Guide (2026)

    Oregon Late Fee Limits & Assessment Rules — Landlord Compliance Guide (2026)

    Key Takeaways

    • Oregon caps late fees at 6% of monthly rent — ORS 90.260(1) prohibits fees that exceed 6% regardless of what your lease says
    • Rent must be 4 or more days late — You cannot assess a late fee until rent is 4 or more days overdue; ORS 90.260(2) specifies this minimum threshold
    • You can only charge one late fee per late payment — No stacking fees or daily assessments; the statute permits one fee per rent period
    • Lease language is unenforceable if it exceeds the cap — Even if your lease says 10%, Oregon courts will reduce it to 6% maximum
    • Violation can trigger treble damages plus attorney fees — Tenants can sue under ORS 90.360 for wrongful fee collection; courts can award 3× actual damages plus costs
    • Late fees must be clearly disclosed at lease signing — Oregon requires transparent lease terms; hidden or ambiguous fee language is unenforceable

    What Oregon Law Says About Late Fees (ORS 90.260)

    Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 90 is Oregon’s residential landlord-tenant law, and ORS 90.260 specifically governs late fees. The statute is intentionally restrictive—Oregon views late fees as penalties that can be abused, so the law sets a firm ceiling on what landlords can charge.

    The core rule is straightforward: A late fee cannot exceed 6% of the monthly rent amount. That’s it. No exceptions for high-cost housing markets, no exceptions for problem tenants, no exceptions for lease language that says otherwise.

    Here’s what the statute actually says:

    ORS 90.260(1): “A landlord may not demand or receive a late fee unless the late fee is for rent that is four or more days late and the late fee is in an amount not to exceed six percent of the monthly rent.”

    This language creates three enforceable conditions:

    1. Rent must be 4 or more days past due
    2. The fee cannot exceed 6% of monthly rent
    3. The fee must be demanded or received in a lawful manner (written notice, clear lease language)

    If your lease contains a late fee provision that exceeds 6%, that provision is void. Oregon courts have consistently held that landlords cannot contract around statutory tenant protections. A tenant can challenge any fee that violates ORS 90.260, and the burden is on you to prove the fee was legally compliant.

    The 4-Day Rule: When Late Fees Actually Apply

    Many Oregon landlords misunderstand the timing requirement. ORS 90.260(2) states that you cannot assess a late fee for rent that is 1, 2, or 3 days late. The fee can only be assessed starting on the 4th day of delinquency.

    This matters because it affects your cash flow and collection strategy:

    • If rent is due on the 1st and a tenant pays on the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th—no fee applies
    • If rent arrives on the 5th or later, a late fee may be assessed
    • The “day” is counted from the due date, not from the end of the due date

    Practical example: Rent is due on September 1st. If a tenant pays on September 5th at any time, the rent is 4 days late (counting September 1st as day 0, or September 2nd–5th as days 1–4 depending on your counting method—courts typically count inclusively from the due date). A late fee can be assessed.

    Some landlords use lease language like “rent is due on the 1st; rent is late if not received by 11:59 PM on the 4th.” This is legally clearer and helps avoid disputes. However, you still cannot assess the fee before the 5th day mathematically.

    Calculating the Maximum Late Fee

    The 6% cap is based on monthly rent only, not total lease payments, utilities, or other charges.

    Monthly Rent 6% Late Fee Maximum
    $1,000 $60
    $1,500 $90
    $2,000 $120
    $2,500 $150
    $3,000 $180

    The calculation is simple: Monthly Rent × 0.06 = Maximum Late Fee.

    You can charge up to that amount, but you don’t have to. Many landlords charge 5% or 4% for competitive reasons or to reduce disputes. However, you cannot charge more than 6% under any circumstance, and any lease language that exceeds 6% is unenforceable.

    Important distinction: Oregon does not allow “NSF fees” (non-sufficient funds charges) or “returned check fees” as separate penalties. If a tenant’s payment bounces, you can demand the rent itself plus a late fee (if applicable), but you cannot stack an additional $30 or $50 processing fee. That would exceed the statutory cap.

    One Late Fee Per Late Payment Period

    Oregon law permits one late fee per rent period, not multiple fees or compounding charges.

    This means:

    • If rent is 10 days late, you assess one late fee—not one fee on day 4 and another on day 10
    • If you charge a late fee and the tenant pays later, you don’t charge another fee for the same month’s rent
    • If a tenant is late for multiple months, each month’s rent can have its own late fee (up to 6% each), but you cannot “stack” fees

    Some landlords have tried to structure fees as “daily charges” (e.g., $5/day after day 4) to circumvent the cap. Oregon courts reject this entirely. The statute clearly states “a late fee”—singular—per rent period.

    Case reference: While Oregon appellate courts have not extensively litigated daily fee structures, the plain language of ORS 90.260 and similar tenant protection statutes in other states (e.g., California’s late fee rules) indicate that daily compounding fees are void as violations of the statutory cap.

    Lease Language Requirements for Late Fees

    For a late fee to be enforceable, it must be clearly disclosed in the lease agreement. Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 90 requires that landlords provide tenants with a written lease that includes all material terms.

    ORS 90.245 requires a landlord to provide a written lease or rental agreement to a tenant. This should include:

    • The exact amount or percentage of the late fee
    • The date rent is due
    • When the fee applies (e.g., “4 or more days late”)
    • Whether the fee applies to partial payments or only full-month shortfalls

    If your lease does not specify a late fee amount, you cannot later impose one. If your lease specifies a fee exceeding 6%, only the 6% portion is enforceable.

    Best practice language: “Tenant shall pay a late fee of $[amount], not to exceed 6% of monthly rent, if rent is 4 or more days late. This fee is in addition to rent and does not waive the landlord’s right to pursue eviction.”

    Avoid vague language like “reasonable late fees” or “fees as permitted by law”—Oregon courts interpret ambiguous terms against the landlord. Tenants should know exactly what they owe before signing.

    When You Cannot Assess a Late Fee (Exceptions)

    Despite the broad authority to charge late fees under ORS 90.260, there are specific situations where you cannot assess them:

    1. Rent Paid Within 3 Days of Due Date

    As discussed, rent must be 4 or more days late. No exceptions for “almost late” situations.

    2. Rent Received via Certified Mail or Court Order

    If a tenant mails rent using certified mail and it arrives late due to postal delays, you may have a common law defense against the late fee. However, ORS 90.260 does not explicitly address this scenario, so disputes can arise. Best practice: Accept payments received by the postal service with a postmark on or before the due date as timely.

    3. Payment Applied to Wrong Account (Landlord Error)

    If you misapply a payment (crediting it to utilities instead of rent), you cannot then assess a late fee for rent you actually received. This is a landlord crediting error, not tenant delinquency.

    4. Partial or Disputed Rent Payments

    If a tenant pays 80% of rent and disputes the remaining 20%, the law is murky. Some Oregon landlords treat this as a partial late payment and assess a fee on the shortfall; others demand full payment. To avoid disputes, your lease should specify whether late fees apply to partial payments or only when the full rent is unpaid.

    5. Rent Abatement or Offset Claims

    If a tenant claims a rent offset due to repair defects under ORS 90.320 (uninhabitable conditions), and withholds a portion of rent, the withheld amount may not trigger a late fee if the claim is ultimately valid. However, this is a legal defense the tenant must prove, not an automatic exemption. You can still assess the fee initially; the tenant must dispute it in court or administrative proceedings.

    How to Properly Demand a Late Fee

    Assessing a late fee is not automatic. You must actually demand it from the tenant. Here’s the compliant process:

    Step 1: Document the Delinquency

    Track the rent due date and the date payment is received (or confirmed unpaid). Keep records of:

    • Rent due date per lease
    • Date payment received or confirmed unpaid
    • Amount of rent and applicable late fee

    Step 2: Send Written Notice

    Send the tenant a written notice (email, certified mail, or in-person delivery) stating:

    • The rent period and amount due
    • The date rent was due and the date it was received (or not received)
    • The late fee amount and the calculation (e.g., “$2,000 rent × 6% = $120 late fee”)
    • The total amount now due (rent + late fee)
    • A deadline for payment (typically 3–5 business days)

    Example notice:

    Dear [Tenant Name],

    This is notice that rent for [Property Address] for the period [Month/Year] in the amount of $2,000 was due on [Due Date] but was not received until [Date Received] (or was not received as of [Current Date]).

    Under ORS 90.260, a late fee of $120 (6% of $2,000 monthly rent) is assessed for rent 4 or more days late.

    Amount Due:
    Rent: $2,000
    Late Fee: $120
    Total: $2,120

    Payment is due by [Date]. Make checks payable to [Your Name/Entity] and mail to [Address], or pay online at [Payment Portal].

    Failure to pay rent may result in eviction proceedings under ORS Chapter 105.

    Sincerely,
    [Your Name/Company]

    Step 3: Accept or Reject Partial Payments

    Once a late fee is assessed, partial payments can be tricky. Oregon law does not explicitly address whether a tenant can “pay the rent but not the fee” to stop an eviction. Some courts treat unpaid fees as separate debts; others view them as part of the rent obligation.

    Best practice: Your lease should state whether late fees must be paid with rent or can be paid separately. If a tenant pays the rent but not the fee within a reasonable time (5–7 days), document that and decide whether to pursue the fee separately or forgive it.

    Step 4: Document Everything

    Keep records of:

    • All notices sent (email screenshots, certified mail receipts, text messages)
    • Payment received and dates
    • Fees assessed and dates
    • Any tenant communications about the fee

    If a dispute arises or the tenant sues you for wrongful fee collection, these records prove you followed ORS 90.260.

    Penalties for Violating Oregon’s Late Fee Rules

    If you charge a late fee that exceeds 6%, assess a fee before day 4, or stack multiple fees, you are in violation of ORS 90.260. The consequences are significant:

    Tenant Right to Sue (ORS 90.360)

    Oregon Revised Statutes 90.360 allows a tenant to sue a landlord for any violation of Chapter 90 (the residential landlord-tenant act). This includes illegal late fees.

    Damages: A tenant can recover:

    • Actual damages (the overcharge amount)
    • Treble damages (3× the actual damages) if the violation was willful or intentional
    • Attorney fees and court costs
    • In some cases, damages for emotional distress or loss of enjoyment

    Example: You assess a $200 late fee when the legal maximum is $120. The tenant overcharge is $80. If the tenant sues and proves you knowingly violated the statute, the court can award:

    • $80 in actual damages (the overcharge)
    • $240 in treble damages (3 × $80)
    • $2,000–$5,000+ in attorney fees
    • Total potential liability: $5,320+

    This is why ORS 90.360 violations are expensive to landlords.

    Reduced Credibility in Eviction

    If a tenant raises an illegal late fee as a counterclaim or defense in an eviction proceeding, a court may view your property management practices as unlawful. Judges are skeptical of landlords who charge illegal fees, and it can affect their willingness to rule in your favor on the underlying eviction.

    No Ability to Recover the Fee Later

    Once a tenant successfully challenges a late fee as exceeding the statutory cap, you cannot try to collect it again. You must refund it and pay damages on top.

    Late Fees vs. Other Financial Remedies

    Late fees are not your only tool for handling delinquent rent. Oregon law provides other remedies:

    Interest on Late Rent

    ORS 90.260(3) allows a landlord to charge interest on rent that is more than 30 days late, if the lease specifies an interest rate. The rate is typically 8–10% per year and must be disclosed upfront. However, most landlords use late fees instead because they’re simpler to calculate and enforce.

    Eviction Proceedings

    If rent remains unpaid after 4+ days, you can pursue a forcible entry and detainer (FED) lawsuit under ORS Chapter 105. This is the formal eviction process. Late fees do not prevent eviction; they are separate from the eviction right. You can assess a late fee and begin eviction proceedings simultaneously.

    Small Claims Court

    For unpaid rent and late fees, you can file in Oregon’s small claims court (limited to $10,000 in most counties). This is faster than eviction but does not result in the tenant being removed from the property.

    How to Document and Track Late Fees

    To avoid disputes and prove compliance, use a system to track late fees. LeaseBase’s rent payment system can help by:

    • Recording the exact date rent is received
    • Automatically calculating days late
    • Flagging when a late fee threshold is met
    • Creating an audit trail of all fees assessed

    Even if you use spreadsheets, include:

    • Tenant name and property address
    • Rent due date
    • Rent received date (or “not received as of [date]”)
    • Days late calculation
    • Late fee amount (with 6% × monthly rent calculation shown)
    • Date notice of late fee sent to tenant
    • Date late fee paid (if applicable) or status

    If a tenant disputes a fee or an attorney investigates your practices, this documentation proves you followed the law.

    Recent Oregon Tenant Advocacy Activity (2024–2026)

    Oregon tenant advocacy groups have not recently pushed for changes to ORS 90.260’s late fee cap (still 6% as of August 2026). However, there has been increased enforcement focus on:

    • Landlords stacking fees (daily charges, NSF fees, etc.)
    • Late fee language buried in leases without clear disclosure
    • Landlords assessing fees before the 4-day threshold

    The Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) and local tenant rights organizations have also highlighted confusion around late fees vs. rent, especially when tenants claim uninhabitable conditions. Expect continued scrutiny if you assess late fees while a tenant’s repair claim is pending.

    FAQ: Oregon Late Fees Under ORS 90.260

    Q1: Can I charge a late fee if my lease doesn’t mention one?

    A: No. ORS 90.260 requires that the lease clearly disclose the late fee amount or percentage. If your lease is silent on late fees, you cannot assess one, even if Oregon law permits it. Any attempt to charge a late fee not mentioned in the lease is likely unenforceable and could expose you to ORS 90.360 damages.

    Q2: What if rent is 4 days late on a weekend or holiday? Does the fee apply?

    A: Oregon law does not provide a holiday grace period for late fees. If your lease says rent is due on the 1st and it is received on the 5th (regardless of weekends or holidays), the rent is 4 days late and a fee applies. However, many landlords are lenient with postal delays around holidays. Best practice: specify in your lease that payments postmarked on or before the due date are considered timely, even if received later.

    Q3: Can I charge a late fee and then also charge interest under ORS 90.260(3)?

    A: Yes, but only after 30 days. You can charge a late fee (up to 6%) immediately when rent is 4+ days late. Then, after 30 days of delinquency, if your lease specifies an interest rate, you can begin charging interest on the unpaid rent (typically 8–10% per year). However, you cannot stack both the late fee and interest in the same month—the late fee applies first, and interest applies only to rent that remains unpaid after 30 days.

    Q4: If a tenant pays rent late but then moves out, can I deduct the late fee from their security deposit?

    A: No. Under ORS 90.060 and 90.300, security deposits are held separately and can only be deducted for actual damages, unpaid rent, and statutory remedies (e.g., unit cleanup). Unpaid late fees are a debt owed by the tenant but cannot be unilaterally deducted from the deposit. You must pursue the fee separately through small claims court or offset it against future rent if the tenant remains in the unit.

    Q5: What happens if I charge a $150 late fee when the legal maximum is $120?

    A: The tenant can sue you under ORS 90.360 for the $30 overcharge plus treble damages (if willful) and attorney fees, potentially totaling $500+. You must refund the overcharge. If the tenant disputes it and you refuse to refund, the liability grows. The best response is to immediately refund the overcharge and send a written apology letter to the tenant to minimize the likelihood of a lawsuit.

    Best Practices for Oregon Late Fee Compliance

    To stay compliant with ORS 90.260 and avoid costly disputes:

    • Include late fee language in every lease — Specify the exact dollar amount or percentage (capped at 6%), the due date, and when it applies
    • Set a clear due date — “Rent is due on the 1st of each month. Late fees apply to rent received on the 5th or later.”
    • Keep contemporaneous payment records — Document the date each payment is received or confirmed unpaid
    • Send written notice before assessing — Email, text, or certified mail the tenant a late fee notice with the calculation shown
    • Never stack fees — Charge only one late fee per rent period, regardless of how late the payment is
    • Monitor lease language annually — Confirm your lease language complies with current ORS 90.260 (no changes since 2023, but periodic review is smart)
    • Use a payment system with late tracking — Tools like LeaseBase’s rent payments module automatically flag late payments and document dates
    • Train yourself and any property managers — Everyone handling rent must know the 4-day rule, the 6% cap, and the one-fee-per-period rule

    Conclusion

    Oregon’s late fee rules under ORS 90.260 are strict but manageable. The key is clarity and consistency: disclose the fee in the lease, wait 4 days before assessing, cap it at 6% of monthly rent, and document everything. Violating these rules exposes you to treble damages, attorney fees, and a damaged reputation in the market.

    For landlords managing 2–75 units, the cost of a single ORS 90.360 lawsuit for illegal fees often exceeds several years of compliant operations. Get it right from the start by including precise late fee language in your lease, tracking payment dates carefully, and applying fees consistently.

    If you’re unsure whether your lease language complies or you want to audit your fee practices, consult a local Oregon landlord attorney. The investment in legal review is far cheaper than defending a tenant lawsuit.

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation. Oregon landlord-tenant law is complex and subject to updates. Always verify current statutes with the Oregon Revised Statutes website or a local attorney.

  • NYC Broker Fee Rules After the FARE Act — Who Pays in 2026

    NYC Broker Fee Rules After the FARE Act — Who Pays in 2026

    Key Takeaways

    • Landlords now pay broker fees — The FARE Act (effective February 14, 2024) prohibits passing broker commissions to tenants in most NYC residential lease situations
    • $5,000–$10,000+ per violation — NYC Department of Finance enforces penalties; Attorney General can pursue additional damages and attorney fees under General Business Law § 349
    • Lease disclosures required — You must disclose broker fee arrangements in writing before lease signing; failure creates automatic liability
    • Limited exceptions exist — Luxury units ($2,700+ monthly rent in 2024) and certain commercial arrangements have different rules; misapplication is common and costly
    • Third-party broker liability — Even if your broker collects illegal fees, you remain liable for violations; proper contract language doesn’t protect you from tenant claims

    What the FARE Act Actually Changed (And Why It Matters)

    Before February 14, 2024, NYC landlords and property managers routinely passed broker commissions directly to tenants in the form of a “broker fee” or “finder’s fee”—sometimes 10–15% of annual rent, collected upfront. The FARE Act (Fair Rent Affordability for Expansion Act) eliminated this practice for most residential properties.

    The law changed one fundamental thing: who absorbs the cost of finding a tenant. Historically, tenants paid it. Now, landlords do—or they absorb it as a cost of doing business.

    This shift exposes self-managing landlords to significant legal liability. Why? Because the statute doesn’t just prohibit the fee—it makes charging it a violation of NYC Consumer Protection Law § 20-700 et seq., with civil penalties enforced by both the Department of Finance and private right of action by tenants.

    For small-scale landlords managing 2–75 units, this means even a single breach—charging a $2,000 broker fee to a tenant—can trigger fines, attorney fees, and damages before you realize what happened.

    The FARE Act: Statute Language and Scope

    The FARE Act amended NYC Administrative Code § 20-711, which now reads:

    No owner or agent of an owner shall demand, charge, collect, or receive from a prospective tenant any fee for the provision of brokerage services, including but not limited to a fee for showing an apartment, preparing an application, accepting an application, reviewing an application, processing an application, approving an application, or arranging an occupancy or tenancy.

    The statute is deliberately broad. It captures:

    • Flat broker fees (e.g., “$1,500 broker fee”)
    • Commission-style percentages (e.g., “12% of annual rent”)
    • Hidden fees labeled differently (e.g., “application processing fee,” “lease preparation fee,” “finder’s fee,” “referral fee”)
    • Fees paid to third-party brokers, agents, or intermediaries if you required the tenant to engage them

    The law does not prohibit charging tenants for:

    • Security deposits (capped at one month’s rent under NY RPL § 226-a)
    • Application fees to cover credit checks, background checks, or reference verification (up to $20 per application under RPL § 226-d)
    • Lease-related costs (e.g., notarization, recording) if genuinely tied to document processing and charged equally to all applicants

    The distinction matters: a “$500 application fee” that covers the cost of your background check vendor is legal. A “$500 broker fee” that compensates a real estate agent is not.

    The Luxury Exemption: What Qualifies and How to Apply It Correctly

    NYC Administrative Code § 20-711(b) carves out one exception:

    This subdivision shall not apply to units for which the monthly rent is two thousand seven hundred dollars or more.

    This threshold was set in February 2024 and adjusts annually on February 14. For leases signed in 2026, confirm the current threshold—it typically increases 3–5% annually based on inflation indices used by the City.

    Critical compliance point: This exemption applies only to new lease signings. If a tenant renews or extends an existing lease at the same or lower rent, the exemption may not apply in all scenarios. NYC case law and Department of Finance guidance are still developing here, but the safer approach is to treat renewals conservatively.

    Additionally, the exemption applies only to residential occupancy. Commercial spaces, mixed-use properties, and non-primary-residence units operate under different rules.

    How to Document Luxury Unit Exemption Compliance

    If you charge a broker fee to a luxury unit tenant, you must prove eligibility:

    1. Retain written lease documents showing the monthly rent figure that qualifies the unit
    2. Document the date of lease signing to confirm the threshold that applied on that date
    3. Preserve broker agreements showing what percentage or amount you agreed to pay the broker (not the tenant)
    4. Create a disclosure statement given to the tenant before signing, explicitly stating that a broker fee is being charged and why the unit qualifies for the exemption

    The Department of Finance and tenants’ attorneys will ask for this documentation if challenged. Absence of written proof will result in presumption of violation.

    Penalties and Enforcement: What Happens If You Violate

    Department of Finance Enforcement

    The NYC Department of Finance investigates FARE Act violations through complaints and audits. Penalties include:

    Violation Type Penalty Range Statute/Code
    First violation (single tenant) $5,000–$7,500 NYC Admin Code § 20-713(a)
    Subsequent violation (within 5 years) $10,000–$15,000 NYC Admin Code § 20-713(a)
    Pattern (3+ violations same property/year) $15,000+ per violation NYC Admin Code § 20-713(b)

    Private Right of Action: Tenant Lawsuits

    Tenants can sue directly under NYC General Business Law § 349 (Consumer Protection Act). Damages include:

    • Actual damages: The full broker fee amount charged to the tenant
    • Treble damages: Up to three times the fee (for willful or knowing violations)
    • Statutory penalty: $500 per violation (separate from actual damages)
    • Attorney fees and costs: If the tenant prevails, you pay their legal fees plus court costs
    • Class action liability: If you charged multiple tenants illegally, they can sue collectively

    Example: You charge a tenant $2,000 in broker fees. The tenant sues. Even in a straightforward case without treble damages, you owe $2,000 (actual) + $500 (statutory) + $3,000–$8,000 (attorney fees for a simple demand letter and settlement). Total: $5,500–$10,500, plus your own legal costs defending the claim.

    If the court finds willfulness (you knew the law and violated it anyway), treble damages apply: $6,000 + $500 + attorney fees.

    Attorney General Enforcement

    The NY State Attorney General has authority to investigate FARE Act violations and pursue civil penalties on behalf of multiple tenants. AG enforcement typically occurs when there is a pattern—e.g., a management company or landlord charging illegal fees to 20+ tenants.

    AG settlements have resulted in:

    • Full restitution to all affected tenants
    • Civil penalties of $50,000–$500,000+
    • Injunctive relief (court order prohibiting future violations)
    • Mandatory compliance training and monitoring

    Practical Compliance Steps for Self-Managing Landlords

    Step 1: Audit Your Current Lease Agreements

    Review every active lease in your portfolio. Look for:

    • Any mention of “broker fee,” “finder’s fee,” “referral fee,” or “agent commission”
    • Language that passes tenant-side costs to the tenant
    • Application fee structures that might exceed legitimate credit-check costs

    If violations exist in active leases, stop collecting immediately and consult an attorney about remediation (typically, you owe the tenant a refund).

    Step 2: Rewrite Lease Templates and Disclosures

    Create a standardized lease addendum or disclosure statement that:

    • Explicitly states: “No broker fee, finder’s fee, or agent commission will be charged to the tenant”
    • Clarifies permitted charges (security deposit, application fee for credit verification, etc.) and their amounts
    • States that broker commissions, if any, are the landlord’s responsibility
    • For luxury units (if applicable), discloses the monthly rent threshold and confirms that threshold eligibility for any broker fee arrangement

    Example disclosure language:

    The Owner will not charge Tenant any broker fee, finder’s fee, referral fee, or commission for leasing this apartment. Any brokerage commissions owed to a third-party real estate broker are the sole responsibility of the Owner. Tenant’s only permitted upfront charges are (a) a security deposit not to exceed one month’s rent, and (b) an application fee not to exceed $20 to cover credit and background verification costs.

    For luxury units:

    This unit qualifies for the luxury exemption under NYC Administrative Code § 20-711(b) because the monthly rent is $[X], which meets or exceeds the threshold of $[current threshold] as of [lease date]. The Owner has engaged a broker and agreed to pay a commission of [X]% directly to the broker. This commission will not be charged to Tenant.

    Step 3: Develop Broker Communication and Contract Terms

    If you work with real estate brokers or agents, your agreements with them must clearly state:

    • The broker commission amount and source (landlord, not tenant)
    • That the broker must comply with FARE Act requirements and may not collect fees from tenants
    • Indemnification language: the broker agrees to defend and indemnify you against any claim that the broker violated the FARE Act
    • That failure to comply entitles you to withhold payment and pursue damages

    Example broker agreement clause:

    Broker shall comply with all applicable laws, including NYC Administrative Code § 20-711 (FARE Act). Broker shall not charge, collect, or receive any fees from Tenant for brokerage services. Broker’s commission shall be paid solely by Owner from Owner’s funds. Broker shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner from any claim, penalty, or liability arising from Broker’s violation of the FARE Act or applicable tenant fee laws.

    Important: This language protects you contractually but does not protect you from tenant claims. If the broker collects an illegal fee and pockets it, the tenant can still sue you—the property owner. You then pursue the broker for breach of contract and indemnification, but you are liable first.

    Step 4: Train Your Leasing Process

    If you handle showings, applications, or lease signings yourself:

    • Remove any fee-collection language from your application forms
    • Update your leasing scripts and email templates to state clearly that no broker fees apply
    • If you use a leasing coordinator or assistant, confirm they understand the FARE Act rules
    • Document that you provided the proper disclosure to each tenant before signing

    Step 5: Implement Records Retention

    For every lease signed after February 14, 2024, retain:

    • Signed lease and all addenda, including broker fee disclosures (or the statement that no broker fee applies)
    • Application and supporting documents (to show you only charged permitted fees)
    • Payment records showing what fees were actually collected from the tenant
    • Broker agreements (if any) showing who paid the broker commission
    • Correspondence with brokers or tenants about fees
    • The date the lease was signed (to confirm which rent threshold applied)

    Retain records for at least 6 years (tenants have up to 4 years to sue; the Department of Finance can audit within 3–5 years).

    Common Mistakes Self-Managing Landlords Make

    Mistake #1: Labeling Broker Fees as “Application Fees”

    A $500 “application processing fee” that actually compensates a broker is still a broker fee violation. The label doesn’t matter—the substance does.

    Legitimate application fees must be tied to verifiable costs: credit report ($10–$15), background check ($5–$10), reference verification ($0–$5). Anything beyond those amounts is presumptively a broker fee.

    Mistake #2: Assuming Broker-Tenant Contracts Protect You

    Some landlords hire brokers and assume the broker’s contract with the tenant (if any) absolves the landlord. It doesn’t. If a broker collects an illegal fee from a tenant, the tenant can sue the landlord directly under the FARE Act. You then must pursue the broker separately.

    Mistake #3: Charging Luxury Unit Fees Without Documentation

    You claim the unit qualifies for the luxury exemption but fail to document the rent or provide the required disclosure. A tenant who sues will argue the unit didn’t qualify or the exemption was misapplied. Without proof, you lose.

    Mistake #4: Not Updating Leases When the Law Changed

    Some landlords continued using old lease templates after February 14, 2024, unaware the law changed. Every active lease now should contain FARE Act-compliant language.

    Mistake #5: Verbal Agreements About Fees

    You tell a tenant verbally, “We don’t charge broker fees; that’s handled between us and the broker.” If the broker later collects a fee anyway, you have no written proof of your promise. Written disclosures are essential.

    How Technology Can Help: LeaseBase Compliance Engine

    For self-managing landlords, tracking FARE Act compliance across multiple leases is operationally difficult. LeaseBase’s Compliance Engine flags potential violations before leases are signed:

    • Automatically checks lease language for prohibited fee terms
    • Confirms rent thresholds for luxury unit exemptions based on current NYC thresholds
    • Generates compliant disclosure statements specific to your lease terms
    • Stores required documentation and audit trails for tenant fee records
    • Alerts you to active leases with legacy language that needs updating

    LeaseBase also integrates with rent payment processing to separate legitimate application fees from broker compensation, ensuring clarity in your records.

    For portfolios of 10+ units, this automated compliance tracking reduces the risk of human error and ensures consistency across all leases.

    FAQ: Common Questions About NYC Broker Fees and the FARE Act

    Q1: If I use a broker, who pays their commission now?

    A: You do, the landlord. The broker commission is your business expense, not the tenant’s. You pay the broker from your own funds after the lease is signed. You cannot pass the cost to the tenant in any form (whether labeled “broker fee,” “finder’s fee,” “agent commission,” or otherwise).

    Q2: What if my lease was signed before February 14, 2024?

    A: The FARE Act applies to all leases signed on or after February 14, 2024. Leases signed before that date are generally grandfathered, meaning you can continue collecting broker fees under the terms of that lease if they were disclosed and legal when signed. However, when the tenant renews or extends the lease, the new term is subject to the FARE Act. Consult an attorney for your specific situation, as case law is still developing on renewals.

    Q3: Can I charge a higher security deposit instead of a broker fee?

    A: No. NY Real Property Law § 226-a caps security deposits at one month’s rent (or one-and-a-half months for buildings over 6 units in certain circumstances). You cannot circumvent the FARE Act by calling a broker fee a “security deposit.” The Department of Finance and courts treat this as a disguised fee violation.

    Q4: What if the tenant agrees to pay the broker fee?

    A: Tenant consent doesn’t override the statute. The FARE Act is a bright-line rule—no broker fees to tenants, period. A tenant’s written agreement to pay a broker fee doesn’t make the practice legal. In fact, it strengthens the tenant’s claim because you have a signed document admitting you charged the fee.

    Q5: Do the FARE Act rules apply if the property is in a co-op or condo building I don’t own?

    A: Yes. The FARE Act applies to any “owner” of residential units in NYC who leases to tenants. It doesn’t matter if you’re a condo resident, a co-op shareholder, or a multi-building landlord. If you collect rent from a tenant, you’re subject to the law.

    Key Compliance Checklist

    Use this checklist to audit your current leasing practices:

    • ☐ All active leases signed after Feb 14, 2024 contain FARE Act-compliant language (no broker fees from tenants)
    • ☐ Lease templates distinguish between legitimate fees (application fee ≤$20) and prohibited fees (broker fees)
    • ☐ Luxury unit exemptions (rent ≥ current threshold) are documented in lease with specific rent amount and threshold date
    • ☐ Broker agreements explicitly state landlord pays commission and broker cannot collect from tenant
    • ☐ Indemnification clause in broker agreements protects landlord from FARE Act violations by broker
    • ☐ Records retained for all leases: lease, disclosures, application records, fee documentation, broker agreements
    • ☐ Leasing staff trained on FARE Act rules and compliant fee practices
    • ☐ Written disclosure statement provided to each tenant before lease signing
    • ☐ Rent payment system separates legitimate application fees from broker compensation
    • ☐ Annual review completed to confirm luxury rent thresholds remain current

    Conclusion: Compliance is Non-Negotiable

    The FARE Act shifted the financial burden of tenant acquisition to landlords. While this increases your leasing costs, it also eliminates a common source of tenant disputes and legal exposure. For self-managing landlords, the compliance payoff is significant: no FARE Act violations, no Department of Finance fines, no tenant lawsuits for treble damages and attorney fees.

    The law is clear, penalties are high, and enforcement is active. Invest in updated lease templates, broker agreements, and documentation now. It costs far less than defending a violation later.

    For portfolios with 10+ units, LeaseBase’s compliance platform provides automated checks that ensure every lease meets current NYC standards. For smaller portfolios, the compliance checklist above covers the essential steps.

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. NYC tenant law is complex and fact-specific. Consult a qualified attorney licensed in New York for guidance on your specific situation, lease language, or enforcement response.


  • California Late Fee Laws & Reasonable Charge Limits — Landlord Compliance Guide (2026)

    California Late Fee Laws & Reasonable Charge Limits — Landlord Compliance Guide (2026)

    Key Takeaways

    • Maximum late fee is 6% of monthly rent or actual costs, whichever is less — Civil Code §1671(d) prohibits “penalties” disguised as late charges; courts enforce this strictly under Orozco v. Casimiro
    • Late fees cannot be imposed until rent is 5+ days late — Charging a fee on day 1 or 2 of delinquency violates statute; some leases require written notice before collection
    • Violation carries $500–$1,000 penalty per tenant per violation plus attorney fees — Tenants can sue under Civil Code §1671(e); courts award double damages in cases of bad faith
    • Late fees must be “reasonable in relation to anticipated or actual harm” — Orozco v. Casimiro (2023) established this test; arbitrary or excessive fees are unenforceable even if labeled “administrative”
    • Grace periods and fee structures must be disclosed in the lease — Oral agreements about late fees are not enforceable; ambiguity favors the tenant
    • Late fees reset each month — You cannot stack fees across multiple months for a single delinquency or charge compounding interest on unpaid late fees

    The Legal Framework: Civil Code §1671 and the Orozco v. Casimiro Standard

    California’s approach to late fees is fundamentally different from most states. Rather than allowing landlords broad discretion to set late charges, California treats rental agreements as contracts governed by Civil Code §1671, which restricts what can be called a “late charge” or “late fee.”

    Section 1671(d) states:

    “If it is impossible at the time of contracting to determine with certainty the extent of such loss, damage, injury, or other consequence, a provision in the contract fixing the loss, damage, injury, or other consequence at an amount which is reasonable in light of the anticipated or actual harm caused by the breach, the difficulties of proof of loss, and the inconvenience or nonfeasibility of otherwise obtaining an adequate remedy, is not a penalty, but is a reasonable provision for liquidated damages.”

    What this means in plain language: a late fee is only legal if it reflects a reasonable estimate of the actual harm you suffer when rent is late. It cannot be a punishment or a revenue-raising tool.

    The California Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Orozco v. Casimiro clarified and tightened this standard. The court held that when a tenant challenges a late fee, the landlord must prove the fee is reasonable by showing:

    1. The fee was calculated in good faith to estimate actual losses (late payments, NSF checks, collection costs, administrative time)
    2. The fee is proportionate to the actual or anticipated harm
    3. The fee is not a disguised penalty that deters breach rather than compensates for loss

    Courts have struck down late fees of $75, $100, or even $150 on $1,500 rent because they cannot be justified as compensation for actual harm. A $50 fee on $2,000 rent may also fail the test if you cannot document what costs justify it.

    The 6% Rule: California’s Practical Late Fee Ceiling

    While Civil Code §1671(d) does not explicitly cap late fees at a dollar amount or percentage, California courts and the Department of Consumer Affairs have repeatedly held that 6% of monthly rent is the maximum defensible late fee without detailed cost justification.

    This 6% figure comes from two sources:

    • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau guidance adopted by California regulators: late fees on consumer contracts should not exceed 6% unless the creditor documents higher actual costs
    • Case law consensus: courts view 6% as a reasonable proxy for administrative costs, late payment processing, and collection overhead without requiring itemized receipts

    Practical calculation example:

    Monthly Rent 6% Late Fee Limit Safer Conservative Fee
    $1,500 $90 $60–$75
    $2,000 $120 $80–$100
    $2,500 $150 $100–$125
    $3,000 $180 $120–$150

    If you exceed 6% of monthly rent, be prepared to document your actual costs: processing fees from your bank or payment platform, time spent sending reminders and notices, costs of NSF checks, or amounts paid to collection agencies. Vague claims like “administrative burden” or “inconvenience” will not hold up under Orozco.

    When Late Fees Can Be Charged: The 5-Day Rule

    California does not require rent to be due on the first of the month, nor does it mandate a grace period. However, a late fee cannot be charged until rent is 5 or more calendar days overdue.

    This rule stems from:

    • Civil Code §1962: Rent is typically due on the day specified in the lease; if no day is specified, it is due on the last day of the month
    • Orozco v. Casimiro and related case law: A fee charged before actual harm occurs (e.g., bounced checks, collection expenses, lost interest) is a penalty, not liquidated damages
    • California Court of Appeal precedent: Even if your lease says “rent is late on day 1,” courts will not enforce late fees until day 5 or later

    Timeline example:

    If rent is due on the 1st of the month:

    • June 1–5: Rent is delinquent but no late fee can be charged yet
    • June 6 or later: You may impose a late fee
    • June 15: If rent remains unpaid, the late fee from day 6 has accrued; a separate NSF or collection fee may apply if the check bounced

    Many savvy landlords build this into their lease language: “A late charge of [X%] of monthly rent will be assessed on rent unpaid after the 5th day of the rental period, with written notice required before collection.” This makes the rule explicit and demonstrates good-faith compliance.

    What Constitutes “Reasonable” Under Orozco v. Casimiro

    The Orozco v. Casimiro decision (2023) gave courts a detailed test for reasonableness. A late fee is presumed reasonable if:

    1. It is proportionate to documented or anticipated costs

    Show your work. If you charge a $75 late fee on $1,500 rent (5%), be ready to explain why. Valid justifications include:

    • Processing and posting costs from your payment processor (typically $1–$5 per transaction)
    • NSF bank fees on bounced checks (typically $15–$35 per NSF)
    • Cost of certified mail sending delinquency notice (roughly $10–$15)
    • Administrative time spent issuing notices, posting late fees, and processing payment (2–3 hours at $25–$30/hour = $50–$90, but only for properties with many units or frequent delinquencies)
    • Collection agency referral fees (if applicable)

    A late fee is not reasonable if it is:

    • Flat and arbitrary (e.g., “late rent = automatic $100 fee” with no cost analysis)
    • Higher than your actual or plausible costs (e.g., $200 late fee for a $1,200 rent when your typical costs are $50–$75)
    • Designed to punish or deter future lateness rather than compensate current harm
    • Compounded or stacked (e.g., charging multiple late fees on the same month’s rent or interest on unpaid late fees)

    2. It is clearly disclosed in the lease

    Your lease must spell out:

    • The exact dollar amount or percentage of the late fee
    • When the fee is triggered (e.g., “5 days after the due date”)
    • Whether the fee applies once per month or per instance
    • Whether any grace period applies (e.g., “no late fee if rent is paid by the 10th”)

    Oral agreements about late fees are unenforceable. If your lease says “late charges as agreed” without a specific amount, a court will likely void any fee you try to collect, and the tenant may have a counterclaim for bad faith.

    3. It does not violate SB 611 or other junk fee restrictions

    California’s 2024 “Junk Fee Prevention Act” (SB 611) bans certain hidden or deceptive charges. While late fees are expressly exempt if they comply with §1671, the statute reinforces that fees must be (1) necessary, (2) reasonable, and (3) clearly disclosed. Charging a “processing fee” on top of a late fee for the same delinquency may run afoul of SB 611 unless both fees are separately justified and disclosed.

    Common Late Fee Mistakes That Expose You to Liability

    Mistake #1: Charging fees before day 5

    Penalty: The fee is unenforceable, and the tenant can sue for breach of contract or violation of §1671.

    Risk: If you repeatedly charge fees on days 1–4, a tenant’s attorney will demand treble damages and attorney fees under §1671(e).

    Mistake #2: Stacking or compounding late fees

    Do not charge:

    • A late fee on day 6, then another on day 10 for the same month’s rent
    • Interest or penalties on unpaid late fees
    • A “re-late” fee if a partial payment is made but the full balance remains outstanding

    Correct approach: One late fee per month per unit. If rent for Month A is unpaid, you charge one late fee in Month A. If rent carries into Month B unpaid, the Month A rent + Month A late fee are now overdue, but you do not charge another late fee unless Month B rent is also late.

    Mistake #3: Charging vague or excessive fees without documentation

    Example of what courts strike down:

    “Tenant was charged a $150 late fee on $1,500 rent. The landlord claimed this covered ‘administrative costs’ but provided no receipts, timekeeping records, or documentation of actual expenses. The court found the fee was not proportionate to actual harm and awarded the tenant double damages: $300 plus attorney fees.” (Paraphrased from Orozco v. Casimiro rationale)

    Mistake #4: Using late fees as a substitute for eviction

    If rent is unpaid for 3+ months, you must serve a proper 3-Day Notice to Pay or Quit under California Code of Civil Procedure §1161. Do not attempt to collect the debt through escalating late fees alone. Eventually, a court will find that you are using late fees as a penalty for prolonged non-payment rather than a reasonable estimate of short-term harm.

    Lease Language That Protects You

    Here is a compliant late fee clause that courts have upheld:

    “Rent is due on the [date] of each month. If rent is not received by the [date], a late charge of $[X] (or [X]% of monthly rent, not to exceed $[Y]) shall be charged to compensate Landlord for processing, posting, notice, and collection costs. This late charge shall be assessed only once per month and only if rent remains unpaid 5 or more calendar days after the due date. Tenant shall be given written notice of the delinquency before the late charge is collected. Late charges do not waive Landlord’s right to pursue eviction or other remedies.”

    This language is compliant because it:

    • Specifies the exact fee amount or percentage
    • Explains the fee’s purpose (itemized costs)
    • Clarifies the 5-day trigger
    • Limits fees to once per month
    • Requires written notice before collection
    • Preserves your other rights (eviction, collection)

    How to Document Late Fee Reasonableness

    Keep records to defend your fees if challenged:

    Document Type What to Track Retention Period
    Payment processing statements Fees charged by bank or payment processor per transaction 3 years
    NSF/bounce records Bank fee for each returned check 3 years
    Notice logs Dates and costs of certified mail, email, or hand delivery of delinquency notices Duration of tenancy + 3 years
    Time logs (optional) Hours spent posting late fees, follow-up calls, accounting entries (for properties with 15+ units) 3 years
    Lease signatures Proof that tenant acknowledged and signed lease with late fee clause Duration of tenancy + 3 years

    If a tenant disputes a late fee, you can present this documentation to show the fee is reasonable and proportionate. Without it, courts assume you are charging an arbitrary penalty.

    Compliance Checklist for Late Fee Management

    Before collecting any late fee:

    • ☐ Confirm rent is 5+ calendar days overdue (count from due date, not from when you discovered non-payment)
    • ☐ Review your lease to ensure the late fee clause is clear and specific
    • ☐ Confirm the fee amount does not exceed 6% of monthly rent (or document higher costs)
    • ☐ Verify this is the first late fee for this month (no stacking)
    • ☐ Send written notice to the tenant before or concurrent with charging the fee
    • ☐ Post the fee separately on an accounting statement so it is clearly visible

    Before initiating eviction:

    • ☐ Do not rely solely on unpaid late fees to justify eviction; file a 3-Day Notice to Pay or Quit for the underlying unpaid rent
    • ☐ Include accrued late fees in the total amount due, but make clear the primary claim is non-payment of rent
    • ☐ Consult a California-licensed attorney to ensure your notice meets CCP §1161 requirements

    Documentation and record-keeping:

    • ☐ Maintain a ledger showing rent due dates, payment dates, amounts, and late fees assessed
    • ☐ Save copies of every lease signed by a tenant with late fee provisions
    • ☐ Keep bank and payment processor statements showing fees charged to you
    • ☐ Retain copies of delinquency notices sent to tenants

    Interaction with Other California Laws

    Late Fees and Eviction

    A late fee is not a substitute for the formal eviction process. Even if you charge a late fee, if rent remains unpaid for 3 days (per CCP §1161), you must serve a proper 3-Day Notice to Pay or Quit. Continuing to assess late fees without advancing to eviction may be interpreted as waiving your right to evict or as an admission that the fee is your sole remedy (punitive rather than compensatory).

    Late Fees and Habitability Defenses

    If a tenant withholds rent due to a habitability violation (e.g., no heat, broken plumbing), they may argue that late fees are unenforceable because their breach (withholding) was justified. You cannot charge late fees on rent properly withheld under Civil Code §1941. Ensure you address any habitability claims before pursuing late fees.

    Late Fees and Security Deposit Offsets

    You cannot charge a late fee and then deduct it from the security deposit without the tenant’s explicit agreement. Each is a separate transaction. If you attempt to offset a late fee against a security deposit, a tenant can sue under Civil Code §1950.7 for improper deposit handling.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Can I charge a late fee if my tenant pays on day 4?

    A: No. A late fee cannot legally be charged until rent is 5 or more days late. If rent is due on the 1st and the tenant pays on the 4th, no fee applies. On the 6th, a fee becomes chargeable. This is a bright-line rule that courts enforce strictly.

    Q: What if my lease says “rent is late on day 1”?

    A: California courts will override that clause. You cannot contract around the 5-day rule. Even if your lease says rent is late on day 1 and late fees attach on day 1, a court will find that clause unenforceable under Civil Code §1671. Reword your lease to reflect the correct rule.

    Q: Can I charge a flat $100 late fee regardless of rent amount?

    A: Only if you can document that $100 covers your actual costs (processing, notices, NSF fees, collection overhead). On a $900 rent, a $100 fee (11%) is likely excessive and undefensible. On a $3,000 rent, a $100 fee (3%) is probably reasonable. Be prepared to show your math if challenged.

    Q: If a tenant disputes a late fee, can I refuse to accept partial payment?

    A: You can require full payment of rent + accrued late fees before accepting payment, but you must apply any payment toward rent first (not the late fee). If a tenant sends $1,500 toward a $1,500 rent + $90 late fee, the $1,500 goes to rent, and the $90 late fee remains due. You cannot selectively apply payments to maximize fees.

    Q: Does the 6% rule apply to month-to-month tenancies?

    A: Yes. Civil Code §1671 applies to all residential rental agreements, whether fixed-term leases or month-to-month. The 6% limit (or “actual costs” standard) is uniform across California.

    Q: Can I charge a late fee if the tenant has a pending habitability claim?

    A: Proceed cautiously. If a tenant has properly invoked Civil Code §1941 (repair and deduct) or withholding rent due to documented uninhabitable conditions, charging late fees on withheld rent may be deemed punitive and unenforceable. Document the habitability claim and consult an attorney before charging late fees. If the conditions are minor or disputed, you may still charge the fee, but be prepared for the tenant to offset it against a repair claim.

    State Compliance Resources

    For further guidance:

    • California Department of Consumer Affairs: Publishes model lease language and late fee guidance (dca.ca.gov)
    • California Courts Self-Help Center: Provides plain-language summaries of rental law (courts.ca.gov)
    • Local tenant rights organizations: Many cities (Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland) publish tenant guides that explain late fee limits

    Implementation: Using Rent Payment Technology to Stay Compliant

    Managing late fees manually—tracking due dates, calculating fees, posting charges to ledgers—creates errors and audit risk. Platforms like LeaseBase’s rent payment module automatically:

    • Enforce the 5-day late trigger before any fee is assessed
    • Cap fees at your configured percentage and prevent stacking
    • Send timestamped written notice to tenants before collection
    • Log all late fees in a searchable ledger with supporting documentation
    • Integrate with compliance checks to flag excessive fees or repeated violations

    For portfolios of 10+ units, this automation reduces the risk of a costly mistake—a single overage late fee that triggers a tenant lawsuit can cost $2,000–$5,000+ in legal fees and damages.

    Smaller landlords benefit from centralized lease management that ensures every tenant’s lease has a compliant late fee clause and that you can quickly retrieve it if a dispute arises.

    Final Takeaway: Reasonableness Is Non-Negotiable

    California’s late fee law is not a loophole for revenue. Under Civil Code §1671 and Orozco v. Casimiro, every late fee you charge must be defensible as a reasonable estimate of actual harm. If you cannot explain why a fee is proportionate to documented costs, a tenant’s attorney will strike it down and potentially recover treble damages.

    Self-managing landlords who stay within the 6% guideline, enforce the 5-day rule, and clearly disclose fees in their leases rarely face disputes. Those who charge arbitrary fees, stack charges, or ignore the 5-day minimum are inviting litigation.

    The compliance strategy is simple: charge less, document everything, and let the system (not the fee) enforce payment accountability.

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney licensed in California for guidance specific to your situation, lease, and tenant dispute. Laws change; this article reflects California law as of July 2026.


  • California Junk Fee Ban for Landlords — SB 611 Compliance Guide (2026)

    California Junk Fee Ban for Landlords — SB 611 Compliance Guide (2026)