Key Takeaways
- Washington limits "at-will" termination severely — RCW 59.18.650(2) requires landlords to prove specific, statutory grounds or face wrongful eviction liability and $4,000+ damages per tenant
- Only six categories of termination are legally defensible — non-payment, lease violation, end-of-lease, owner move-in, substantial damage, or nuisance/criminal activity defined in statute
- Notice periods vary by termination type — 20 days for non-payment, 30 days for lease violations, and 60+ days for owner move-in (with relocation assistance requirement)
- Pretextual terminations trigger attorney's fees and statutory damages — Washington courts presume wrongful eviction if termination appears retaliatory or lacks documented cause
- Economic hardship or "bad fit" are not valid grounds — landlords cannot terminate based on tenant complaints, protected class status, or financial circumstances outside the six statutory categories
- Documentation before notice is essential — landlords must have written evidence of the violation or ground before serving termination notice or risk dismissal and sanctions
Why Washington's Termination Law Matters: The Liability Trap
Washington State imposes one of the most landlord-unfavorable termination regimes in the country. Unlike many states where month-to-month tenancy can end with simple notice, Washington requires landlords to prove concrete cause. Serve a termination notice without statutory grounds, and you're exposed to:
- Wrongful eviction claims under RCW 59.18.650(2)
- Actual damages (lost wages, moving costs, emotional distress)
- Statutory damages of up to $4,000+ per tenant
- Tenant's attorney's fees (not recoverable by landlord even if you win)
- Potential state Department of Labor investigation
The statute doesn't say "you can terminate anytime." It says: "A landlord shall not terminate a tenancy, evict a tenant, increase rent, or decrease services based on retaliation." More critically, RCW 59.18.650(2) creates a presumption of retaliation if termination occurs within 90 days of a tenant exercising rights under the Residential Tenancies Act. This presumption shifts the burden to you to prove the termination was for one of six permitted grounds.
For self-managing landlords with 2–75 units, this is where documentation becomes your defense. You need to understand not just what grounds exist, but how to document them before notice is served.
The Six Legally Valid Termination Grounds Under RCW 59.18.650
Washington Residential Tenancies Act (RCW 59.18) permits lease termination only when one of these six conditions exists. Straying outside these categories makes the termination unlawful, regardless of your intent.
1. Non-Payment of Rent (20-Day Notice)
The most common and easiest to defend termination ground is unpaid rent. However, Washington requires specific procedures:
- Written notice requirement: You must serve a 20-day notice to pay or quit before filing eviction. This notice must state the exact rent amount due, the period it covers, and the date payment is due.
- No grace period required by statute: Rent is due on the date specified in the lease. Late fees are permitted but capped at 10% of one month's rent under RCW 59.18.270 unless the lease specifies a lower amount.
- Partial payment rule: If the tenant pays ANY portion of rent during the 20-day period, the notice is voided and you must serve a new 20-day notice if rent remains unpaid after the deadline passes.
- Payment must be in full: Washington courts have held that accepting partial rent and then terminating is a waiver of the non-payment claim. You cannot cherry-pick which months constitute grounds.
Compliance checklist for non-payment termination:
- [ ] Confirm rent is actually due under lease (check lease commencement date and payment terms)
- [ ] Review all payments received in the current month and prior month (no credits or deductions applied?)
- [ ] Verify tenant has been offered legal payment plan options if they requested one (RCW 59.18.600 requires good-faith negotiation)
- [ ] Prepare 20-day notice with exact dollar amount, period, and date due
- [ ] Serve notice via method specified in lease and RCW 59.18.140 (personal delivery, certified mail, or posting on door plus mail)
- [ ] Do NOT accept partial payment during the 20 days without explicitly stating in writing that it is "partial payment not curing the notice"
- [ ] Wait full 20 days before filing eviction action in court
- [ ] Retain all payment records, lease, and notice copies for court
2. Lease Violation or Material Non-Compliance (30-Day Cure Notice)
A tenant who breaches lease terms—other than rent—can be terminated, but only with proper notice and opportunity to cure.
- 30-day notice to cure or quit requirement: RCW 59.18.650(1)(c) requires written notice specifying the violation, the lease provision violated, and a 30-day period to remedy the breach.
- Materiality standard: The violation must be "material"—meaning significant enough to substantially interfere with quiet enjoyment or safety. Minor violations (one day late trash out, small nail hole) likely don't meet this threshold.
- Examples of material violations: Unauthorized occupants, smoking in no-smoke unit, large pet in no-pet unit, running a business from the unit, repeated noise complaints with documentation, severe cleanliness issues creating health hazard.
- Repeated violations of same type: If a tenant violates the same lease term more than once within 12 months, you may terminate without offering a second cure opportunity (though best practice is to offer cure notice anyway to avoid retaliation claims).
Compliance checklist for lease violation termination:
- [ ] Identify specific lease clause being violated (quote it verbatim in notice)
- [ ] Document the violation with dates, times, and evidence (photos, noise complaints from neighbors, lease rider confirming occupancy limits, etc.)
- [ ] Assess whether violation is "material" under state law (consult Washington landlord-tenant law resources or legal counsel if unsure)
- [ ] Serve 30-day notice to cure or quit specifying the violation and cure deadline
- [ ] If tenant cures within 30 days, the notice is satisfied and no further action required
- [ ] If tenant does not cure by day 30, file eviction action; do NOT serve a second notice unless it's a different violation
- [ ] If same violation occurs again within 12 months, you may terminate without cure notice (but serve it anyway to be safe)
- [ ] Never terminate for violation of a rule not in the lease or addendum (e.g., pet restriction if lease doesn't mention it)
3. End of Lease Term (60-Day or 90-Day Notice, No Cause Required)
When a fixed-term lease nears expiration, a landlord may choose not to renew. This is the one termination scenario where no "cause" is needed—but notice requirements are strict.
- Notice timeline: For leases ending on a specific date, you must provide notice no later than 60 days before lease expiration if the lease is one year or longer, or 30 days if the lease is shorter than one year. RCW 59.18.200 governs this.
- Month-to-month tenancies: Converting to month-to-month after initial lease ends? You must provide 20 days' notice to end a month-to-month tenancy. Note: As of 2024, Washington requires 60 days' notice to increase rent on month-to-month (HB 1217), so if you're terminating because you want to raise rent, you must provide the longer notice.
- Retaliation presumption still applies: Even though no cause is required for non-renewal, if you non-renew within 90 days of tenant's protected activity (rent withholding, repair complaint, habitability claim), the court presumes retaliation. You must prove the non-renewal was planned before the protected activity occurred.
Compliance checklist for lease non-renewal:
- [ ] Check lease expiration date and calculate notice deadline (60 days for annual lease, 30 days for shorter term)
- [ ] Confirm no protected tenant activity occurred in past 90 days (complaint to health department, rent withholding, lease modification request)
- [ ] If protected activity occurred, document your business reason for non-renewal predating the activity (e.g., email to portfolio manager dated before complaint)
- [ ] Serve non-renewal notice in writing at least 60 days before lease end (or 30 days for shorter leases)
- [ ] Use standard notice form or clearly state: "Your lease ending [date] will not be renewed. Your tenancy will terminate on [date]. You must vacate by [date]."
- [ ] Keep copy of notice served and proof of delivery (certified mail receipt, email, or signed acknowledgment)
- [ ] Do NOT condition non-renewal on rent increase, maintenance completion, or other demand (that appears retaliatory)
4. Owner/Family Move-In (60-Day Notice + Relocation Assistance)
Washington permits termination if the landlord or immediate family intends to occupy the unit. This ground is heavily scrutinized for pretext and carries mandatory relocation assistance obligations.
- Who qualifies: Only the owner, spouse, domestic partner, parent, grandparent, child, or grandchild. "Owner" means someone with legal title or deed. Corporate entities cannot use this ground.
- Intent requirement: The person must genuinely intend to occupy the unit as a primary residence for at least one year. Courts look skeptically at owner move-in notices if the unit is re-rented to someone else within months.
- 90-day notice required (not 60): RCW 59.18.650(1)(e)(i) requires 90 days' written notice specifying the person who will occupy the unit, their relationship to owner, and intended occupancy date.
- Relocation assistance mandatory: RCW 59.18.650(1)(e)(ii) requires landlord to pay tenant one month's rent or up to $1,500, whichever is greater, within a reasonable time if the tenant has lived there less than one year; or one and a half month's rent or $2,200, whichever is greater, if tenant has lived there one year or more. This applies even if tenant did nothing wrong.
- Relocation deadline: Payments must be made before or concurrently with service of the termination notice. Failure to pay voids the termination notice.
- Documentation critical: Keep email, texts, or written statements from the family member confirming occupancy intention. Be prepared to show this in court if tenant disputes the claim.
Compliance checklist for owner move-in termination:
- [ ] Confirm family member has established connection to landlord (marriage certificate, birth certificate, deed, or trust documents)
- [ ] Document the family member's intent to occupy (email from family member, property records showing no other residence, utility account setup)
- [ ] Calculate relocation assistance: (1) Under 1 year occupancy = max(1 month rent, $1,500); (2) 1+ year = max(1.5 months rent, $2,200)
- [ ] Arrange payment by check, ACH, or other method; retain proof of payment
- [ ] Serve 90-day notice concurrently with or before relocation payment is tendered
- [ ] Notice must state: family member's name, relationship, and intended occupancy start date
- [ ] If tenant remains in unit after 90 days and notice was proper, file eviction action (unlawful detainer)
- [ ] If you later decide NOT to occupy the unit or rent it to someone else within one year, you may face damages claim for wrongful eviction
5. Substantial Damage to Property (30-Day Notice or Immediate Termination)
A tenant who causes severe damage beyond normal wear and tear can be terminated. This ground requires documented proof and a distinction between damage and habitability issues.
- Damage vs. habitability: If the property is uninhabitable due to damage (no heat, no water, structural failure), the landlord's remedy is repair or tenant buyout—not termination. Termination applies when the tenant damaged a habitable unit.
- Damage caused by tenant: The damage must result from tenant's acts or negligence, not normal wear, weather, or landlord failure to maintain. Examples: large holes punched in walls, destroyed flooring, broken appliances due to misuse, flooded unit from tenant leaving water running.
- Notice or immediate termination: For willful, malicious damage or safety hazard, you may terminate immediately without cure notice. For other substantial damage, 30-day notice to cure or quit is required.
- Cost threshold unclear: RCW 59.18.650 doesn't specify a dollar amount for "substantial." Courts typically look at whether repair costs exceed normal security deposit limits or materially reduce property value.
Compliance checklist for substantial damage termination:
- [ ] Photograph and document all damage with date stamps
- [ ] Obtain written repair estimate from licensed contractor specifying damage cause and cost
- [ ] Confirm damage is tenant-caused, not pre-existing, weather-related, or maintenance-related
- [ ] For willful/malicious damage: serve immediate termination notice or 30-day cure notice at your discretion
- [ ] For other substantial damage: serve 30-day notice to cure or quit (tenant must repair or pay for repair)
- [ ] If tenant cures by repairing or paying for repair within 30 days, notice satisfied
- [ ] If tenant does not cure, file eviction action and use repair estimates as evidence
- [ ] Do NOT unilaterally repair and deduct from security deposit; this is a separate remedy and does not terminate tenancy
6. Criminal Activity or Nuisance Behavior (Immediate Termination Without Notice)
A tenant engaged in criminal activity or creating a public nuisance can be terminated immediately without notice or cure opportunity, but only under strict conditions defined by statute.
- Statutory definition of nuisance: RCW 59.18.130 and RCW 59.18.650(1)(d) define nuisance narrowly: activity that substantially and materially interferes with other tenants' peaceful enjoyment or involves criminal conduct.
- Criminal activity: Felony drug manufacturing/distribution on premises, felony weapons violations, domestic violence, sex offender registration violations, or methamphetamine production. Misdemeanor or minor criminal conduct (even if prosecuted) may not qualify.
- Documented history required: Isolated incident may not be enough; courts look for pattern or severity. Multiple police reports, convictions, or documented incidents strengthen the claim.
- Police report or conviction: Best practice: obtain copy of police report, arrest records, or court judgment before serving termination notice. Notice without documentation is contested easily.
- Immediate termination language: Notice must state: "You are being terminated immediately for [specific criminal activity or nuisance], which violates RCW 59.18.650(1)(d). Your tenancy ends on [date], which is at least 20 days from service of this notice" (even though you can terminate immediately, you should still provide 20-day notice to comply with residential tenancy requirements and give tenant time to vacate before eviction filing).
Compliance checklist for nuisance/criminal activity termination:
- [ ] Obtain police report, arrest records, or incident documentation
- [ ] Confirm activity is enumerated in RCW 59.18.650(1)(d) or creates documented nuisance (multiple neighbor complaints with dates/times)
- [ ] Review lease for nuisance/criminal clause matching statute
- [ ] Preserve evidence: save police reports, complaint emails, incident logs, witness statements
- [ ] Serve immediate termination notice specifying the criminal act or nuisance with supporting facts
- [ ] Even though termination is immediate, provide 20+ days before filing unlawful detainer to comply with procedural requirements
- [ ] If tenant doesn't vacate within notice period, file eviction action with police report and lease clause as exhibits
- [ ] Do NOT make independent investigation of criminal allegations; rely on police reports and court documents
The Retaliation Presumption: Why Documentation Starts Before Notice
Washington's most powerful tenant protection is the retaliation presumption in RCW 59.18.650(2). This is where careful landlords separate themselves from lawsuits.
The statute presumes retaliation if termination occurs within 90 days of:
- Tenant reporting code violation or habitability defect to landlord or government agency
- Tenant requesting written repair or maintenance
- Tenant joining or forming tenant union or advocacy group
- Tenant engaging in lawful union activity
- Tenant calling 911 or filing police report (domestic violence, criminal activity)
- Tenant filing complaint with Department of Labor, Attorney General, or city housing authority
If any of these events occurred within 90 days before you serve termination notice, the court automatically assumes you're retaliating—even if you have cause. You must then prove by clear and convincing evidence that:
- The termination reason existed and was documented before the protected activity, OR
- The termination would have occurred anyway regardless of the protected activity
Example of retaliation trap: Tenant reports mold in bathroom on Monday. You discover unpaid rent on Wednesday and serve 20-day notice on Friday. Even though non-payment is valid cause, the court presumes retaliation because notice was served within 90 days of the complaint. You must produce lease payment records, collection emails, or prior notices predating the complaint to overcome the presumption. If you can't, the termination is voided.
Defense against retaliation presumption:
- Maintain detailed lease payment and violation records from day one of tenancy
- Document violations or non-payment in real time (email, letter, inspection report) with dates
- Store all communications in chronological order (shared drive, email folders, document management system)
- If you're using lease operations software, log all violations and payment issues as they occur—don't backdate notes
- If tenant reports an issue, respond in writing and preserve your response email; if you send a notice to cure or pay, keep the served copy and proof of delivery
Comparison: Valid Termination Grounds and Notice Requirements
| Termination Ground | Notice Period | Cause Needed? | Cure Right? | Additional Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-payment of rent | 20 days | Yes | Yes (pay full rent due) | No acceptance of partial payment |
| Lease violation | 30 days | Yes (material breach) | Yes (first occurrence) | Specific lease clause cited; documented violation |
| End of lease term | 60 days (annual lease); 30 days (short-term) | No | N/A (lease expires) | Retaliation presumption still applies within 90 days of protected activity |
| Owner/family move-in | 90 days | Yes (genuine occupancy intent) | No | Relocation assistance: (1 yr) $1,500 min.; (1+ yr) $2,200 min. |
| Substantial damage | 30 days (other damage); immediate (willful/malicious) | Yes | Yes (unless malicious) | Contractor estimate; proof of tenant cause |
| Criminal activity / nuisance | Immediate (minimum 20 days before eviction) | Yes (statutory criminal acts or nuisance) | No | Police report, conviction, or documented incidents |
Common Mistakes That Void Termination Notices
Self-managing landlords often make errors that render otherwise valid termination grounds unenforceable:
Mistake 1: Lack of Specificity in Notice
A notice stating "You are violating the lease and must cure or quit" is too vague. RCW 59.18.650 requires the notice to specify which lease provision is violated and describe the violation. Example: "You have an unauthorized occupant in the unit in violation of Lease Section 3.2 (Occupancy Limit). Only two occupants are permitted; three individuals are currently residing in the unit as of [date]. You must remove the unauthorized occupant by [cure date]."
Mistake 2: Accepting Rent or Partial Payment After Serving Non-Payment Notice
If you serve a 20-day pay-or-quit notice and tenant pays part of rent during the 20-day period, the notice is voided. If you then accept that payment without explicitly stating "this is partial payment not curing the notice," the court views it as a waiver of the non-payment claim. You must then serve a new notice.
Mistake 3: Failing to Document Pre-Notice Violation
If you serve a lease violation notice without evidence the violation existed (inspection photos, neighbor complaints, etc.), the tenant can argue the notice was pretextual. Courts require proof of violation predating the notice. Use maintenance and inspection logs to timestamp all documented violations.
Mistake 4: Omitting Relocation Payment for Owner Move-In
Many landlords serve 90-day owner move-in notice but forget to pay relocation assistance. The notice is void. Tenant can remain past the 90 days, and you'll owe damages for wrongful eviction attempt.
Mistake 5: Terminating Based on Retaliation-Trigger Events Without Pre-Existing Documentation
Tenant calls 911 about your property condition. Within 60 days, you serve non-payment notice. Unless you have earlier payment records or prior collection notices documenting the non-payment, the court presumes retaliation.
Mistake 6: Using "Cause" Termination Without Valid Lease Language
Your lease doesn't mention nuisance or criminal activity grounds. Tenant engages in criminal conduct. You attempt to terminate under RCW 59.18.650(1)(d). Tenant's attorney argues the lease doesn't incorporate the statute. While courts typically find statutory grounds are implied, a lease explicitly incorporating RCW 59.18.650 grounds strengthens your position.
Eviction Timeline After Valid Termination Notice
Serving notice doesn't end the process. After the notice period expires and tenant fails to cure or vacate, you must file an unlawful detainer action in District Court. Here's the timeline:
| Step | Timeline | Notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Serve termination notice | Day 0 | Notice period begins; preserve proof of service | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Notice period expires (no cure) | Day 20–90 (depending on ground) | Tenant has until end of day on last day of notice to cure or vacate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. File unlawful detainer complaint in District Court | Day 21+ (after notice expires) | Include original lease, proof of notice service, evidence of ground (non-payment records, photos, police report, etc.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. Court serves summons on tenant | Within 5 business days of filing | Tenant has right to appear; many do not | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. Tenant responds or default occurs | 20 days from service of summons | If tenant doesn't respond, judgment entered for landlord by default | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. Court hearing (if contested) | 30–60 days after filing | Judge decides if termination was proper; bring all evidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7. Judgment issued | Same day (default) or after hearing (contested) | If you win: judgment for possession and any unpaid rent/fees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Oregon Criminal Records Screening Limits & Lookback Periods — Landlord Compliance Guide (2026)Key Takeaways
What Does Oregon Law Actually Say About Criminal Records Screening?Oregon Revised Statute 90.303(3) is straightforward but frequently misunderstood by self-managing landlords. The statute reads:
This means you cannot screen a tenant out solely because they have a criminal record. You can only consider convictions that occurred within the past 10 years. The 10-year clock starts from the date of sentencing, not from the date of arrest or conviction verdict. The practical effect: If an applicant was convicted of a felony in 2014 and sentenced in 2015, by July 2026 (11 years later), that conviction is outside the lookback window and cannot be used in your screening decision. The 10-Year Lookback Period: How to Calculate It CorrectlyThis is where landlords make costly mistakes. The statute uses "date of sentencing" as the trigger, not the date of arrest or even the conviction date. Example Scenario 1: Felony Conviction
Example Scenario 2: Misdemeanor Conviction
Many landlords and screening companies still pull full criminal histories without applying the lookback filter. This creates liability. Oregon's Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) has enforcement authority over fair housing violations, and violations are treated as unfair or deceptive business practices under ORS 646.607. What Types of Convictions Can You Screen For?ORS 90.303(3) does not say you can screen for all crimes. It permits consideration only if the conviction:
Oregon courts and housing advocates interpret "relevance" strictly. Convictions for violent crimes, property crimes, drug trafficking, or crimes involving fraud or dishonesty may be relevant to housing. Convictions unrelated to tenancy (e.g., a 5-year-old speeding ticket elevated to criminal misdemeanor in rare cases) may not be. Critical distinction: The statute permits you to consider convictions, but it does not require you to deny housing based on them. You must still apply business judgment, consider rehabilitative factors, and avoid disparate impact discrimination. What You Cannot Screen For Under ORS 90.303(3)
Using any of these categories as a screening criterion creates statutory liability and potential liability under the Oregon Fair Housing Act (ORS 659C.065). Sealed and Expunged Records: The Special RuleOregon allows certain criminal records to be sealed or expunged. Under ORS 137.225, a person convicted of a crime can petition to seal the record after a waiting period. Once sealed, the applicant has a legal right to answer "no" when asked about the conviction. Your obligation: If an applicant discloses a conviction, then later provides evidence the record was sealed or expunged, you must treat it as if it never happened. Denying housing based on a sealed or expunged conviction violates ORS 90.303(3) and exposes you to damages. Many screening companies still report sealed records. If you use a third-party screening service, verify in writing that they:
You remain liable for information your screening vendor provides, even if you didn't know it violated ORS 90.303(3). Practical Compliance: How to Screen Tenants LegallyStep 1: Create a Written Screening PolicyDocument your criminal records screening criteria before you show any units. Your policy should state:
Why this matters: If a tenant challenges your denial, you'll need to show your policy was applied consistently. Inconsistent application is evidence of discrimination. Step 2: Use a Compliant Screening Service or DIY with CareIf you use a third-party screening company, request their compliance documentation. They should confirm in writing that their reports include:
LeaseBase's compliance engine flags discrepancies in screening reports and alerts you to records outside the lookback period so you don't accidentally use them. If you screen manually using public records, calculate the 10-year window yourself. Do not rely on the screening company's calculation alone. Step 3: Document Your DecisionIf you deny tenancy based on criminal history, document:
Do not document vague reasons like "criminal history" or "bad background." Specificity protects you in litigation. Step 4: Provide Notice of Denial (If Applicable)Oregon does not have a specific statute requiring notice of denial based on criminal records screening results, but fair housing best practices and federal guidance under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) suggest providing notice if you use a third-party screening service. Your notice should disclose:
If you deny based on information in the report, follow FCRA requirements by providing a copy of the report and notice of the applicant's rights. Common Compliance Mistakes and PenaltiesMistake #1: Using Convictions Older Than 10 YearsWhat happens: Tenant files complaint with Oregon BOLI alleging discrimination based on criminal history. BOLI investigates and finds you considered a 2013 conviction in 2026. Penalty: Up to $1,000 per violation under ORS 646.607. If the investigation finds pattern of discrimination (e.g., you rejected three applicants with old convictions), penalties multiply. Additional liability under ORS 659C.065 for actual damages (lost housing), attorney fees, and civil penalties up to $5,000. Mistake #2: Screening Based on Arrest RecordsWhat happens: Applicant has arrest for felony drug possession in 2024, charges were dismissed in 2025. You deny based on the arrest. Applicant provides evidence dismissal letter. Penalty: Tenant can sue for damages under ORS 659C.065. Oregon courts have awarded damages for lost housing opportunity, emotional distress, and attorney fees. Mistake #3: Using a Screening Service That Doesn't Filter ProperlyWhat happens: You use a national screening company. Their report includes a 2012 conviction from Oregon. You deny applicant. Applicant sues and names both you and the screening company. Penalty: You are liable. The fact that you relied on a vendor does not shield you. Oregon courts hold landlords responsible for the accuracy of information used in tenant decisions. You should have verified the report applied the 10-year lookback rule. Damages include actual damages, attorney fees, and potentially punitive damages if the violation was knowing or reckless. Mistake #4: Inconsistent Application of Criminal Records PolicyWhat happens: You deny applicant A for a felony within the 10-year window but approve applicant B with a similar conviction. Applicant A has documentation showing you applied different standards. Penalty: Inconsistency is evidence of discrimination. BOLI may investigate whether the denial was based on protected class status (race, color, national origin, disability, etc.). Oregon enforces both ORS 90.303(3) and ORS 659C.065 (Fair Housing Act). Penalties range from $1,000 to $10,000+ depending on damages found. Recent Law Changes and Agency Guidance (2024–2026)As of July 2026, Oregon has not amended ORS 90.303(3) since its adoption, but enforcement has intensified. The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries has prioritized housing discrimination complaints involving criminal records screening, particularly as they intersect with race and national origin discrimination. Key enforcement trend: Regulators are scrutinizing whether landlords apply criminal records screening equally across protected classes. For example, if you screen white applicants' convictions strictly but overlook convictions of applicants of color, you've engaged in disparate treatment discrimination. Be prepared to show your policy was applied uniformly. Additionally, some local jurisdictions (e.g., Portland) have local ordinances that may impose stricter limitations than state law. Always check local rules; local ordinances preempt state law if they're more protective. Building a Compliant Screening Process: Checklist
Can You Consider Convictions Beyond the 10-Year Window?No. The statute is unambiguous. However, Oregon law does allow limited exceptions for crimes involving sex offenses or crimes against children. ORS 90.303(3) itself contains language permitting consideration of certain categories despite age, but only in specific circumstances defined by law. This exception is narrowly interpreted by Oregon courts and rarely applied in rental housing context. If an applicant has a decades-old conviction for a serious crime: You cannot use it as grounds for denial under ORS 90.303(3). Your only option is to deny based on other legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons (e.g., insufficient income, poor credit, failure to pay prior rent). Integration With Other Screening FactorsCriminal records screening is one piece of tenant evaluation. You must also consider:
Do not allow a single negative factor to disqualify an applicant without considering the full picture. This is especially true for criminal records, where rehabilitation, time elapsed, and mitigating factors matter in fair housing analysis. LeaseBase's lease operations module helps you document and standardize your entire tenant evaluation process, ensuring consistency across all applicants. Frequently Asked QuestionsQ1: If an applicant discloses a conviction on their application, am I required to run a background check?A: No. You may choose to run a background check or rely on self-disclosure. If you do run a check, you must apply ORS 90.303(3) fairly. However, if an applicant discloses a conviction and you approve them without verification, you cannot later deny based on a background check that contradicts their disclosure. Treat all applicants' disclosures consistently. Q2: What if an applicant tells me they have a conviction, but the background check shows it was sealed?A: The applicant had a legal right to answer "no" to any conviction question. The sealed record is off-limits for your decision. If you deny based on a sealed conviction, you violate ORS 90.303(3). Treat the disclosure as non-existent and proceed with approval or denial based on other factors. Q3: Can I deny a tenant because of pending criminal charges?A: No. Pending charges are not convictions. ORS 90.303(3) applies only to final convictions. Denying based on pending charges exposes you to discrimination liability. Wait for resolution or deny based on other factors. (Note: If charges result in conviction, you can then apply ORS 90.303(3) to future applications.) Q4: Does Oregon law allow me to deny tenancy based on conviction of a violent crime within the 10-year window?A: Potentially, but only if you can articulate a legitimate business reason (e.g., "applicant convicted of assault poses unacceptable risk to safety of other tenants"). You must document this reason. However, you still must apply your policy consistently and ensure you're not using violent crime convictions as a pretext for discrimination based on protected class status. Consider the applicant's age at the time of conviction, time elapsed, evidence of rehabilitation, and circumstances surrounding the crime. Q5: My screening company says they comply with Oregon law, but I'm not 100% sure. What should I do?A: Request written confirmation in writing that their reports: (1) exclude convictions older than 10 years from date of sentencing; (2) calculate the 10-year window from your report date; (3) exclude sealed, expunged, and dismissed records; (4) exclude arrests without convictions. Ask for a sample report showing how they label sentencing dates. If they cannot provide this documentation, switch vendors. Your liability is non-delegable; you're responsible for what information is used in your tenant decisions, regardless of vendor assurances. Key Takeaway for Self-Managing LandlordsOregon's ORS 90.303(3) is not optional compliance. The 10-year lookback period, calculated from date of sentencing, is a hard-stop rule. Violations are treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices with statutory penalties up to $1,000 per violation, plus potential damages under the Oregon Fair Housing Act. Tenants can recover actual damages, attorney fees, and civil penalties up to $5,000. The best protection is a documented, consistently applied screening policy that explicitly incorporates the 10-year lookback rule and excludes all categories of records outside the statute. Verify any third-party screening vendor in writing and do your own lookback calculation on every conviction discovered. Document your decision thoroughly and be prepared to explain your business reason if challenged. If you manage 2–75 units, manual tracking of screening decisions across multiple properties and applicants creates risk. LeaseBase's portfolio management tools centralize screening documentation and ensure consistent application of your policy across all properties. Automated compliance flagging alerts you before you make a costly mistake. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation. Oregon housing law is complex and enforcement is strict. When in doubt, seek counsel before denying tenancy based on criminal history. ![]() Window Guards & Safety Requirements for Children Under 11 — New York Landlord Compliance Guide (2026)Key Takeaways
What Are Window Guards and Why NYC Law Requires ThemWindow guards are metal bars or mesh screens installed on apartment windows to prevent accidental falls—particularly for young children. New York City recognizes that unguarded windows present a serious fall hazard: children between ages 2 and 10 account for the majority of fall-related injuries in residential settings. In 2024–2025, NYC reported over 150 pediatric window-related injuries annually, many of which were preventable. NYC Health Code §131.15 treats window guards as a mandatory habitability requirement, not optional safety equipment. The law applies to:
As a self-managing landlord, you are responsible for knowing whether your unit is occupied by or designated for children under 11. This information typically appears in your lease, rental application, or initial tenant communication. Even if a tenant doesn't disclose the presence of children, once you're notified (via written request, HPD complaint, or any other means), you must treat the unit as subject to the window guard requirement. Legal Requirements Under NYC Health Code §131.15Section 131.15 of the NYC Health Code establishes four core compliance requirements: 1. Installation RequirementLandlords must install window guards on all windows in units with children under 11. The regulation does not provide exceptions for:
The law is strict: you cannot condition installation on tenant agreement, charge the tenant for installation, or delay installation based on tenant preference or lease terms. 2. Performance StandardsWindow guards installed under §131.15 must meet these specifications:
HPD inspectors test window guard compliance by applying force and checking bar spacing. If bars exceed 4 inches apart or a guard fails the force test, it is cited as a violation. 3. Landlord Responsibility for Installation and MaintenanceInstallation and maintenance are entirely the landlord's responsibility and expense. You cannot:
If a guard becomes damaged, loose, or corroded, you must repair or replace it within 14 days of notice from the tenant or HPD. Delaying repairs to save money is a violation and can result in escalating fines. 4. Tenant Right to Request in WritingTenants have the right to request window guards in writing. Once a written request is received (email, letter, text message, or formal request through HPD's online portal), you have 14 calendar days to comply. The 14-day clock starts from the date the request is received by you or your designated agent. If you fail to respond within 14 days, the tenant can file an HPD complaint, and you face:
HPD Violations, Penalties, and EnforcementViolation ClassificationWindow guard violations are classified as Class C violations under NYC Housing Maintenance Code violations. Here's the penalty structure:
Violations are issued by HPD and adjudicated through OATH (Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings). If you do not contest a violation within 30 days, a default judgment is issued, and you must pay the full penalty. Accumulation of Violations and Property HistoryMultiple window guard violations at the same property create a pattern that HPD uses to establish neglect of habitability standards. If your property accumulates three or more violations within 12 months, HPD may:
Violation history is also discoverable in tenant disputes, giving tenants evidence of your non-compliance in rent abatement or habitability claims. Practical Compliance Checklist for LandlordsStep 1: Identify Units with Children Under 11 (Before and During Tenancy)At move-in:
During tenancy:
Step 2: Measure and Assess Windows Before InstallationBefore ordering guards, measure all windows in the unit:
Take photos of the windows for your records and to share with your vendor. Step 3: Select Compliant Window GuardsPurchase guards that meet §131.15 specifications:
Common compliant products include steel bar guards and mesh grille guards from vendors such as Mako Guards, FirstAlert Window Guard, and other HPD-approved manufacturers. Request compliance certificates from your vendor. Step 4: Install Within Legal TimeframeProactive installation (no tenant request): Install within 30 days of learning the unit houses a child under 11. Response to tenant request: Install within 14 calendar days of receiving written request. Document the installation date with photos, work order, and contractor receipt. Save all documentation for HPD review if needed. Step 5: Conduct Regular Maintenance InspectionsInspect window guards at least twice annually (spring and fall):
Document inspections in writing (create a simple checklist or spreadsheet with date, unit number, condition, and any repairs needed). Step 6: Respond Promptly to Maintenance RequestsIf a tenant requests repair or replacement, respond within 7 days (well ahead of the 14-day legal requirement) with:
Create a log of all tenant requests and your responses. This protects you if the tenant later claims you failed to respond. How to Handle Tenant Disputes and RefusalsTenant Refuses to Allow InstallationSome tenants resist window guard installation, claiming they obstruct views, block light, or violate their autonomy. Under NYC law, tenant preference is irrelevant. You must install window guards regardless of tenant objection. How to proceed:
Tenant Disables or Removes GuardsIf a tenant removes, disables, or tampers with window guards after installation, this is a lease violation and a safety hazard. Document the condition with dated photos and send the tenant a formal written notice:
In the interim, you may need to file an emergency violation with HPD to protect yourself legally, showing that you took corrective action and the violation was caused by the tenant, not landlord negligence. Tenant Claims Disability AccommodationOccasionally, a tenant may claim that window guards violate an ADA accommodation or create a safety issue for a disabled household member (e.g., a person using a wheelchair who needs unobstructed window access for emergency egress). How to respond:
Note: NYC Health Code §131.15 does not provide an exemption for disability accommodations, but an interactive process may reveal reasonable alternatives. Seek legal counsel to navigate this properly. HPD Complaint Process and Your DefenseHow Tenants File HPD ComplaintsTenants can file window guard complaints online through HPD's website (hpd.gov), by phone (311), or through community organizations. HPD will issue a complaint number and schedule an inspection within 5–10 business days. What to expect:
Contesting a ViolationIf you believe an HPD violation is incorrect, you can file a hearing request with OATH within 30 days of the violation notice. Bring:
If you win the hearing, the violation is dismissed. If you lose, you must pay the fine within 30 days or request a payment plan from HPD. Non-Payment ConsequencesFailing to pay HPD violations within 30 days of an OATH judgment results in:
Pay violations promptly to avoid compounding costs and legal complications. Window Guards and Rent Abatement ClaimsIf a tenant discovers that your unit lacks window guards and you fail to install them, the tenant may pursue a rent abatement claim in housing court. The tenant argues that the unit is not fit for habitation under New York Real Property Law §235 and seeks a reduction of rent. Courts have found that missing or non-functional window guards in units with children under 11 constitute a breach of the implied warranty of habitability. Judges may abate rent by 5–30% depending on:
Example: A tenant with two children under 11 lives in a $2,000/month apartment. You fail to install window guards for four months despite the tenant's written request. A judge may order you to refund 20–30% of rent for those months ($400–$600/month × 4 = $1,600–$2,400 total), plus the tenant's attorney fees. Preventing rent abatement claims by installing window guards proactively is far cheaper than defending a housing court lawsuit. Special Situations and ExceptionsHistoric Landmark BuildingsLandlords of historic landmark properties can request a variance from NYC's Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) if window guards are deemed incompatible with the building's historic character. Important: A variance is not automatic. You must:
Until a variance is formally granted, you are still required to install compliant window guards. Do not delay installation while awaiting a variance decision. Single-Family Homes and Small BuildingsNYC Health Code §131.15 applies to "multiple dwellings," which includes any building with 3 or more units. Single-family homes and 2-unit buildings are technically exempt from the Health Code requirement, but you should still consider window guards as a liability and habitability best practice if you house families with young children. Air Conditioning Units and Window ObstructionWindow guards must be installed even if the window has an air conditioning unit. Install the guard on the interior side of the AC unit or select a guard design compatible with AC units. Do not skip windows because of AC units; HPD will still cite a violation for missing guards. Integrating Window Guard Compliance into Your Leasing and Portfolio ManagementSelf-managing landlords typically track dozens of compliance obligations across multiple units. Centralizing window guard information—along with lease data, tenant contact info, and maintenance history—reduces the risk of missed deadlines. Consider these management practices:
For multi-unit portfolios, a compliance management system that flags tenant requests and tracks installation deadlines is invaluable. LeaseBase's compliance engine automatically tracks statutory deadlines and alerts you when action is needed, ensuring that critical habitability items like window guards don't slip through the cracks. Frequently Asked QuestionsQ1: Do I need window guards if the tenant doesn't have children currently but might have children in the future?A: No, but you should be prepared to install them immediately if the tenant notifies you that a child under 11 is moving in or if the tenant requests them in writing. Your lease should clarify that if children under 11 move into the unit, window guards will be provided at no cost to the tenant and installed within 14 days of notice. Some landlords proactively install guards in family-designated units to avoid future delays. Q2: Can I charge the tenant a monthly fee to maintain or replace window guards?A: Absolutely not. Window guard installation, maintenance, and replacement are landlord responsibilities and cannot be passed to the tenant in any form—not as a monthly fee, a surcharge, a deduction from rent credits, or a security deposit deduction. Charging tenants violates §131.15 and gives the tenant grounds to file an HPD complaint and seek damages. Q3: What if my tenant tampered with or removed the window guard?A: Document the condition with timestamped photos and send the tenant a formal notice to restore the guard within 5 business days. If the tenant refuses, you can: (1) enter the unit yourself (with proper notice) and reinstall the guard; (2) pursue a lease violation charge; or (3) file a violation with HPD to establish that the landlord (you) is compliant and the violation is tenant-caused. Do not ignore the problem, as it opens you to liability and tenant complaints. Q4: Do window guards need a quick-release mechanism for fire safety?A: Quick-release mechanisms are optional but recommended. If you use them, verify that the mechanism complies with NYC Building Code §1005.1 (emergency egress requirements) and that the mechanism is located at adult height and operable without tools. Standard bar guards are compliant under §131.15 even without a quick-release, as long as they don't block emergency exits (e.g., windows serving as required fire escapes). Q5: What should I do if HPD issues a violation for a window guard that was already in place?A: Request an inspection record or violation photo from HPD to understand the specific finding (e.g., "Bar spacing exceeds 4 inches" or "Guard is corroded and non-functional"). If the guard was compliant when installed but degraded over time, you may need to replace it. File a hearing request with OATH, bring proof of prior installation and your compliance history, and explain any maintenance issues. If the guard met standards when installed and was damaged by tenant use or weather, you may successfully contest the violation or pursue the tenant for damage. Key Takeaways for Your Compliance Calendar
ConclusionWindow guards are not optional in NYC. Health Code §131.15 is a strict liability statute: if a child under 11 lives in your unit, you must install, maintain, and repair compliant window guards at your expense. Violations carry $500–$1,000 per window penalties, expose you to rent abatement claims, and damage your property's compliance record. The easiest compliance path is to:
For self-managing landlords juggling multiple units, integrating window guard requirements into your lease process and lease operations workflow |









